| Literature DB >> 26573027 |
Neda Ezzeddin1, Roza Zavoshy, Mostafa Noroozi, Mohammad Ebrahim Sarichloo, Hassan Jahanihashemi.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION &Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26573027 PMCID: PMC4873575 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
The association between PPD and some demographics and obstetrics variables among studied mother
| Variables | depressed | Non-depressed | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| (%)N | (%)N | ||
| Mother age | |||
| 48(52.2) | 44(47.8) | ||
| 81(50) | 81(50) | 0.941 | |
| 23(50) | 23(50) | ||
| Mother BMI | |||
| 6(75) | 2(25) | ||
| 68(48.6) | 72(51.4) | 0.288 | |
| 50(52.6) | 45(47.4) | ||
| 14(40) | 21(60) | ||
| pregnancy ranks | |||
| 72(47.4) | 72(48.6) | ||
| 50(32.9) | 47(31.8) | 0.972 | |
| 30(19.7) | 29(19.6) | ||
| type of delivery | |||
| 30 (43.5) | 39(56.5) | ||
| 122(52.8) | 109(47.2) | 0.173 | |
| the history of abortions or stillbirths | |||
| 34(22.4) | 32(21.6) | ||
| 118(77.6) | 116(78.4) | 0.876 | |
| infant sex | |||
| 75(48.7) | 79(51.3) | ||
| 76(52.8) | 68(47.2) | 0.482 | |
| Mother occupational status | |||
| 134(51.5) | 126(48.5) | ||
| 18(45) | 22(55) | 0.441 | |
| Education level of mother | |||
| 40(62.5) | 24(37.5) | ||
| 112(47.5) | 124(52.5) | 0.033 | |
| Iron supplementation During pregnancy | |||
| 120(48.2) 32(62.7) | 129(51.8)19(37.3) | 0.058 | |
| Iron supplementation after pregnancy | |||
| 53(37.3) 99(62.7) | 89(62.7) 59(37.3) | < 0.001 | |
Chi-square test.
The association between PPD and Pica during pregnancy
| groups | Pica during pregnancy | Total | P-value | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||||
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||
| Non-depressed | 141(95.3) | 7(4.7) | 148(100) | ||
| Depressed | 134(88.2) | 18(11.8) | 152(100) | 0.026 | 2.70 (1.095-6.685) |
| Total | 275(91.7) | 25(8.3) | 300(100) | ||
Chi-square test;
OR = odds ratio;
CI =confidence interval.
The association between Length and kind of pregnancy Pica with PPD
| Variables | Length of Pica during pregnancy (month) | Type of pica | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%)N | (%)N | |||||
| 134(48.7) | 2(40) | 16(80) | 134(48.7) | 12(63.2) | 6(100) | |
| 141(51.3) | 3(60) | 4(20) | 141(51.3) | 7(36.8) | ||
| 275(100) | 5(100) | 20(100) | 275(100) | 19(100) | 6(100) | |
| 0.023 | 0.024 | |||||
The association between iron supplementation during pregnancy and pica practice
| Variables | Pica practice | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Total | ||
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| 237(95.2) | 12(4.8) | 249(100) | P< 0.001 | |
| 38(74.5) | 13(25.5) | 51(100) | ||
Chi-square test.
Final logistic regression model for predicting PPD
| variables | P-value | OR | 95 % C.I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| 0.201 | 1.485 | 0.81 | 2.723 | |
| 0.153 | 2.043 | 0.767 | 5.438 | |
| 0.822 | 1.084 | 0.536 | 2.191 | |
| < 0.001 | 2.705 | 1.628 | 4.496 | |
Note. Table is based on results of binary logistic regression (only for significant situations based on chi-square Test on Table 1).
Odds ratio
Confidence Interval.
Frequency of Pica reasons by women in depressed and non-depressed groups
| groups | Pica reasons by women N (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unable to say | satisfy craving | Relief of nausea | reduced stress and anxiety | Other reasons | |
| 4 (40) | 1(25) | 1(100) | 0(0) | 1(50) | |
| 6(60) | 3(75) | 0 | 8(100) | 1(50) | |
| 10(100) | 4(100) | 1(100) | 8(100) | 2(100) | |