| Literature DB >> 19876499 |
Atchuta Kameswararao Avasarala1, Saibharghavi Panchangam.
Abstract
CONTEXT: It is well-known that every health problem, not only presents itself with different epidemiological profiles in different population settings, but is also perceived and managed differently. Having knowledge of these variations in its presentations and perceptions in different population settings, for example, in urban and rural settings, will be useful for its successful management. AIM: To study differences in epidemiological profiles, perceptions, socio economic losses, and quality-of-life losses and management of dysmenorrhoea in different settings for effective management. DESIGN ANDEntities:
Keywords: Dysmenorrhoea in different settings; Karimnagar district; management differences; social losses; urban-rural variations
Year: 2008 PMID: 19876499 PMCID: PMC2763707 DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.43231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Community Med ISSN: 0970-0218
Urban–rural distribution of dysmenorrhoea
| Dysmenorrhoea | Urban group (%) n = 101 | Rural group (%) n = 79 | Total (%) n = 180 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dysm+ve | 53 (52.5) | 44 (55.7) | 97 (53.89) |
| Dysm-ve | 47 (47.5) | 35 (44.3) | 83 (46.11) |
Dysmenorrhoea and its risk factors
| Risk factors | Urban group (%) n = 53 | Rural group (%) n = 44 | Total (%) n = 97 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive family history | 35 (66) | 22 (50) | 57 (58.7) |
| Sensitive personality | 41 (77.3) | 26 (59) | 67 (68.8) |
| Stress | 32 (60) | 11 (25) | 43 (45) |
Stress and dysmenorrhoea
| Stress factor | Urban group (%) n = 53 | Rural group (%) n = 44 | Total (%) n = 97 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stress present | 32 (60.3) | 11 (25) | 43 (44) |
| Stress free | 21 (39.7) | 33 (75) | 54 (55.7) |
Sickness absenteeism due to dysmenorrhoea
| Sickness absenteeism in 2007 | Urban group (%) n = 53 | Rural group (%) n = 44 | Total (%) n = 97 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absent from classes | 38 (71.6) | 9 (20.5) | 47 (48.5) |
| Absent from exams | 19 (35.8) | 8 (18) | 27 (27.8) |
| Assignment not completed | 28 (52.8) | 6 (13.6) | 34 (35) |
| Reprimanded by teachers | 36 (67.9) | 21 (47.7) | 97 (100) |
Quality-of-life losses due to dysmenorrhoea
| Life facet | Urban group (%) n = 53 | Rural group (%) n = 44 | Total (%) n = 97 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor general adoption | 31 (58.5) | 17 (38.6) | 48 (49.48) |
| Loss of physical independence | 29 (54.7) | 7 (15.9) | 40 (42.42) |
| Poor work satisfaction | 35 (66) | 15 (34) | 50 (51.54) |
| Personal relationships not good | 25 (47) | 11 (25) | 36 (37.11) |
| Social integration not good | 27 (50.1) | 6 (13.6) | 33 (34.02) |
| Physical activity not good | 38 (71.7) | 11 (25) | 49 (50.51) |
| Leisure activities not good | 22 (41.5) | 12 (27) | 34 (35.05) |