INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of the knee, particularly in infectious situations, can be achieved using either an external fixator or an intramedullary device. The objective of this study is to report the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of a continuous series of 19 cases of knee arthrodesis using a customized modular intramedullary nailing system. HYPOTHESIS: The modular intramedullary nail offers a satisfactory functional result while maintaining limb length, in spite of a nonunion risk, since acting like a true endoprosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our retrospective series of 19 patients, the main source of patients were infected total knee replacements. The nail was customized from assembling a dual surface-sanded titanium component (femoral and tibial). The Lequesne Algofunctional score and the WOMAC score were recorded, as well as the length discrepancy between the lower extremities. Arthrodesis consolidation and the nail's fit in the shaft were verified on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. RESULTS: Five complications were observed: one anterior cortical break, one excessive tibial rotation, two cases of delayed union, and one nail revision due to residual nail instability. The postoperative Lequesne Algofunctional score was 13/24 and the WOMAC score 57/100. The nonunion rate was 32%. From a functional point of view, the patients who did not achieve complete union and those who did had similar scores. The subjective results were not as good in patients who did not achieve final consolidation. DISCUSSION: Modular intramedullary nailing simplifies the technique, shortens the procedure, and reduces the amount of blood loss at surgery. Our nonunion rate was high, although the functional result did not seem compromised by such nonunion. The risk of long-term implant failure was not studied and requires longer follow-up studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV therapeutic study. 2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of the knee, particularly in infectious situations, can be achieved using either an external fixator or an intramedullary device. The objective of this study is to report the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of a continuous series of 19 cases of knee arthrodesis using a customized modular intramedullary nailing system. HYPOTHESIS: The modular intramedullary nail offers a satisfactory functional result while maintaining limb length, in spite of a nonunion risk, since acting like a true endoprosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our retrospective series of 19 patients, the main source of patients were infected total knee replacements. The nail was customized from assembling a dual surface-sanded titanium component (femoral and tibial). The Lequesne Algofunctional score and the WOMAC score were recorded, as well as the length discrepancy between the lower extremities. Arthrodesis consolidation and the nail's fit in the shaft were verified on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. RESULTS: Five complications were observed: one anterior cortical break, one excessive tibial rotation, two cases of delayed union, and one nail revision due to residual nail instability. The postoperative Lequesne Algofunctional score was 13/24 and the WOMAC score 57/100. The nonunion rate was 32%. From a functional point of view, the patients who did not achieve complete union and those who did had similar scores. The subjective results were not as good in patients who did not achieve final consolidation. DISCUSSION: Modular intramedullary nailing simplifies the technique, shortens the procedure, and reduces the amount of blood loss at surgery. Our nonunion rate was high, although the functional result did not seem compromised by such nonunion. The risk of long-term implant failure was not studied and requires longer follow-up studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV therapeutic study. 2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Authors: M Gathen; J Schmolders; M D Wimmer; N Gravius; T M Randau; S Gravius; M Friedrich Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 1.154
Authors: P J H Van Rensch; G J Van de Pol; J H M Goosen; A B Wymenga; F H R De Man Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-05-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Arnold J Suda; Xaver Brachtendorf; Marco Tinelli; Raed Wagokh; Ghaith Abou-Nouar; Oliver E Bischel Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Nicholas M Brown; Rishi Balkissoon; Bryan M Saltzman; Bryan Haughom; Jefferson Li; Brett Levine; Scott Sporer Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Date: 2020-09
Authors: Dirk Zajonz; Benedikt Zimmerlich; Robert Möbius; Melanie Edel; Johanna Przybyl; Andreas Höch; Johannes K M Fakler; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem Journal: Orthopade Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 1.087