Literature DB >> 19874171

Effects of a diagnosis or family history of alcoholism on the taste intensity and hedonic value of sucrose.

Kristen A Tremblay1, Jessica M Bona, Henry R Kranzler.   

Abstract

Given inconsistent findings in published studies, we examined whether a personal lifetime history of alcohol dependence (AD) or a parental history of alcoholism affected preference for sweet solutions. Ninety-three alcohol-dependent subjects rated the intensity and hedonic value of five different sucrose solutions, which was compared with similar data from 122 subjects screened to exclude alcohol dependence. The effect of a family history of alcoholism (FH) was examined in the AD group. Neither the diagnosis of AD nor a family history of alcoholism was associated with ratings of sweetness intensity or sweet preference. These findings do not support the hypothesis that sucrose preference is positively associated with either a personal lifetime history of AD or a family history of alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19874171      PMCID: PMC2862626          DOI: 10.3109/10550490903206023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Addict        ISSN: 1055-0496


  19 in total

1.  Bitter and sweet components of ethanol taste in humans.

Authors:  A Scinska; E Koros; B Habrat; A Kukwa; W Kostowski; P Bienkowski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Perceived intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in male alcoholics.

Authors:  Michal Wronski; Dominika Skrok-Wolska; Jerzy Samochowiec; Marcin Ziolkowski; Lukasz Swiecicki; Przemyslaw Bienkowski; Agnieszka Korkosz; Paweł Zatorski; Wojciech Kukwa; Anna Scinska
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Effects of cigarette smoking and family history of alcoholism on sweet taste perception and food cravings in women.

Authors:  Marta Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Evidence of preference for a high-concentration sucrose solution in alcoholic men.

Authors:  A Kampov-Polevoy; J C Garbutt; D Janowsky
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates.

Authors:  Sarah A Lanier; John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-11-21

6.  Association between preference for sweets and excessive alcohol intake: a review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  A B Kampov-Polevoy; J C Garbutt; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.826

7.  Preference for higher sugar concentrations and Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire scores in alcoholic and nonalcoholic men.

Authors:  A B Kampov-Polevoy; J C Garbutt; C E Davis; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Sweet liking phenotype, alcohol craving and response to naltrexone treatment in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  James C Garbutt; Michael Osborne; Robert Gallop; John Barkenbus; Kathy Grace; Meghan Cody; Barbara Flannery; Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.826

9.  Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Andrew C Davidson; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; William C Speed; Andrew J Pakstis; Danielle R Reed; Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  J P Rice; T Reich; K K Bucholz; R J Neuman; R Fishman; N Rochberg; V M Hesselbrock; J I Nurnberger; M A Schuckit; H Begleiter
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  8 in total

1.  A preliminary study of the human brain response to oral sucrose and its association with recent drinking.

Authors:  David A Kareken; Mario Dzemidzic; Brandon G Oberlin; William J A Eiler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Taste intensity in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Carla R Schubert; Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; James S Pankow; Guan-Hua Huang; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Sociodemographic and Behavioral Factors Associated with Added Sugars Intake among US Adults.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Frances E Thompson; Lisa C McGuire; Liping Pan; Deborah A Galuska; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Perceptual Qualities of Ethanol Depend on Concentration, and Variation in These Percepts Associates with Drinking Frequency.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Derivation and characterization of replicate high- and low-alcohol preferring lines of mice and a high-drinking crossed HAP line.

Authors:  Brandon Oberlin; Christina Best; Liana Matson; Angela Henderson; Nicholas Grahame
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Olfaction in alcohol-dependence: a neglected yet promising research field.

Authors:  Pierre Maurage; Philippe Rombaux; Philippe de Timary
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-03

7.  Family history of alcoholism and the human brain response to oral sucrose.

Authors:  William J A Eiler; Mario Dzemidzic; Christina M Soeurt; Claire R Carron; Brandon G Oberlin; Robert V Considine; Jaroslaw Harezlak; David A Kareken
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Finding the Sweet Spot: Measurement, Modification, and Application of Sweet Hedonics in Humans.

Authors:  Eunjin Cheon; Evan J Reister; Stephanie R Hunter; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 8.701

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.