OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high patient inflow volumes to an intensive care unit are associated with unplanned readmissions to the unit. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis. SETTING: The setting is a large urban tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 3233) discharged from an adult neurosciences critical care unit to a lower level of care from January 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome variable is unplanned patient readmission to the neurosciences critical care unit within 72 hrs of discharge to a lower level of care. The odds of one or more discharges becoming an unplanned readmission within 72 hrs were nearly two and a half times higher on days when > or =9 patients were admitted to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.26) compared with days with < or =8 admissions. The odds of readmission were nearly five times higher on days when > or =10 patients were admitted (odds ratio, 4.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-10.17) compared with days with < or =9 admissions. Adjusting for patient complexity, the odds of an unplanned readmission were 2.34 times higher for patients discharged to a lower level of care on days with > or =10 admissions to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.34) compared with similar patients discharged on days of < or =9 admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Days of high patient inflow volumes to the unit were associated significantly with subsequent unplanned readmissions to the unit. Furthermore, the data indicate a possible dose-response relationship between intensive care unit inflow and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand how to defend against this risk for readmission.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high patient inflow volumes to an intensive care unit are associated with unplanned readmissions to the unit. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis. SETTING: The setting is a large urban tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 3233) discharged from an adult neurosciences critical care unit to a lower level of care from January 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome variable is unplanned patient readmission to the neurosciences critical care unit within 72 hrs of discharge to a lower level of care. The odds of one or more discharges becoming an unplanned readmission within 72 hrs were nearly two and a half times higher on days when > or =9 patients were admitted to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.26) compared with days with < or =8 admissions. The odds of readmission were nearly five times higher on days when > or =10 patients were admitted (odds ratio, 4.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-10.17) compared with days with < or =9 admissions. Adjusting for patient complexity, the odds of an unplanned readmission were 2.34 times higher for patients discharged to a lower level of care on days with > or =10 admissions to the neurosciences critical care unit (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.34) compared with similar patients discharged on days of < or =9 admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Days of high patient inflow volumes to the unit were associated significantly with subsequent unplanned readmissions to the unit. Furthermore, the data indicate a possible dose-response relationship between intensive care unit inflow and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand how to defend against this risk for readmission.
Authors: Michael E Wilson; Lori M Rhudy; Beth A Ballinger; Ann N Tescher; Brian W Pickering; Ognjen Gajic Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Michael O Harhay; Kelly C Vranas; Elizabeth Cooney; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-02
Authors: James A Town; Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Michael T Huber; John P Kress; Dana P Edelson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Carl O Eriksson; Ryan C Stoner; Karen B Eden; Craig D Newgard; Jeanne-Marie Guise Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hannah Wunsch; Jason Wagner; Maximilian Herlim; David H Chong; Andrew A Kramer; Scott D Halpern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 7.598