Literature DB >> 19865603

On Quantitizing.

Margarete Sandelowski1, Corrine I Voils, George Knafl.   

Abstract

Quantitizing, commonly understood to refer to the numerical translation, transformation, or conversion of qualitative data, has become a staple of mixed methods research. Typically glossed are the foundational assumptions, judgments, and compromises involved in converting disparate data sets into each other and whether such conversions advance inquiry. Among these assumptions are that qualitative and quantitative data constitute two kinds of data, that quantitizing constitutes a unidirectional process essentially different from qualitizing, and that counting is an unambiguous process. Among the judgments are deciding what and how to count. Among the compromises are balancing numerical precision with narrative complexity. The standpoints of "conditional complementarity," "critical remediation," and "analytic alternation" clarify the added value of converting qualitative data into quantitative form.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19865603      PMCID: PMC2768355          DOI: 10.1177/1558689809334210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mix Methods Res        ISSN: 1558-6898


  5 in total

Review 1.  Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Answers to unasked questions: writing in the margins.

Authors:  D K Clayton; S Rogers; A Stuifbergen
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Cesarean birth outside the natural childbirth culture.

Authors:  M Sandelowski; R Bustamante
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Endings, secrets, and silences: overreading in narrative inquiry.

Authors:  S Poirier; L Ayres
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.228

  5 in total
  66 in total

1.  Personal factors associated with reported benefits of Huntington disease family history or genetic testing.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Cheryl Erwin; Andrew Juhl; James Mills; Bradley Brossman; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-08-19

2.  The promise of mixed-methods for advancing latino health research.

Authors:  Ester Carolina Apesoa-Varano; Ladson Hinton
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Maternal Concern for Child Undereating.

Authors:  Callie L Brown; Megan H Pesch; Eliana M Perrin; Danielle P Appugliese; Alison L Miller; Katherine Rosenblum; Julie C Lumeng
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  A Pilot Study for Understanding the Perceptions of Australian General Practitioners Regarding Psychopharmacology for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; David Lillystone; David Dossetor; John Eastwood; Siaw-Teng Liaw
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-04-20

5.  Vape Shop Owners/Managers' Opinions About FDA Regulation of E-Cigarettes.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Dianne C Barker; Steve Sussman; Betelihem Getachew; Kim Pulvers; Theodore L Wagener; Rashelle B Hayes; Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Use of Theoretical Frameworks as a Pragmatic Guide for Mixed Methods Studies: A Methodological Necessity?

Authors:  Bronwynne C Evans; David W Coon; Ebere Ume
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2011-10-01

7.  A mixed methods study of perceived barriers to physical activity, geriatric syndromes, and physical activity levels among older adults with peripheral artery disease and diabetes.

Authors:  Mary O Whipple; Erica N Schorr; Kristine M C Talley; Ruth Lindquist; Ulf G Bronas; Diane Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  J Vasc Nurs       Date:  2019-03-11

8.  Mentoring for Success in Tobacco Regulatory Science: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Abigail R Russo; Amy C Solis; Andrea C Villanti; Heather L Wipfli; Teresa T Kern; Rachel K Lawley; Lauren K Collins; Haneen S Abudayyeh; Melanie C Chansky; Stanton A Glantz; Jonathan M Samet; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-07

9.  Motivations for genetic testing for lung cancer risk among young smokers.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Isaac M Lipkus; Saskia C Sanderson; James Shepperd; Sharron Docherty; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Mapping the Mixed Methods-Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Jennifer Leeman; Jamie L Crandell
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2011-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.