Literature DB >> 19864938

In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes.

Anton F Engelsman1, Gooitzen M van Dam, Henny C van der Mei, Henk J Busscher, Rutger J Ploeg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of morphology of surgical meshes on the course of bacterial infection under the influence of the host immune system in an in vivo chronic bacterial infection model.
BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic meshes has increased dramatically the last decades in abdominal wall reconstructive surgery. Whereas infection is becoming a more frequent complication, attention is increasingly drawn to the influence of the surgeon's mesh choice on the course of this complication.
METHODS: Samples of 6 often applied surgical meshes were contaminated with a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus and implanted subcutaneously in an immunocompetent BALB/c mouse. The intensity and the spreading of bioluminescence (ie, p/s/cm/sr) were analyzed non-invasively in vivo during a 10-day follow-up period.
RESULTS: Over the course of infection, multifilament polypropylene and hydrophobic materials showed a significantly higher persistence of bacteria as well as spreading of infection compared to all other meshes. In contrast, infection resolved in almost all animals with a low-weight polyester mesh.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study are in accordance with circumstantial evidence from limited clinical reports on infection involving surgical meshes and suggest that multifilament and hydrophobic meshes significantly increase bacterial persistence or spreading in the infected area in contrast to monofilament polypropylene and lightweight meshes. Therefore, the surgeon should consider this outcome when choosing a mesh graft for limiting infection in abdominal wall repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19864938     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b61d9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination.

Authors:  A Díaz-Godoy; M A García-Ureña; J López-Monclús; V Vega Ruíz; D Melero Montes; N Erquinigo Agurto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Postoperative Mesh Infection-Still a Concern in Laparoscopic Era.

Authors:  Rajvilas Narkhede; N M Shah; P R Dalal; Chirantan Mangukia; Shreyas Dholaria
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  A critical review of the in vitro and in vivo models for the evaluation of anti-infective meshes.

Authors:  O Guillaume; B Pérez Kohler; R Fortelny; H Redl; F Moriarty; R G Richards; D Eglin; A Petter Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Blatnik; David M Krpata; Michael R Jacobs; Yue Gao; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Biofilm formation on stainless steel and gold wires for bonded retainers in vitro and in vivo and their susceptibility to oral antimicrobials.

Authors:  Marije A Jongsma; Floris D H Pelser; Henny C van der Mei; Jelly Atema-Smit; Betsy van de Belt-Gritter; Henk J Busscher; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The results of open preperitoneal prosthetic mesh repair for acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia: a retrospective study of 146 cases.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Jie Chen; Yingmo Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia after stoma reversal: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kevin W Y van Barneveld; Ruben R M Vogels; Geerard L Beets; Stephanie O Breukink; Jan-Willem M Greve; Nicole D Bouvy; Marc H F Schreinemacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Influence of Adhesion Force on icaA and cidA Gene Expression and Production of Matrix Components in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Akshay K Harapanahalli; Yun Chen; Jiuyi Li; Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  History of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surgical site infection may not be a contraindication to ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C W Hicks; J A Blatnik; D M Krpata; Y W Novitsky; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.