Literature DB >> 19864934

Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients.

Christiane Strauss1, Frederic Mal, Thierry Perniceni, Nadia Bouzar, Stephane Lenoir, Brice Gayet, Robert Palau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Water-soluble contrast swallow (CS) is usually performed before refeeding for anastomosis assessment after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis but the sensitivity of CS is low. Another diagnostic approach is based on analysis of computed tomography (CT) scan with oral contrast and of CT mediastinal air images. We undertook to compare them prospectively.
METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with an esophageal carcinoma operated by intrathoracic anastomosis were included prospectively in a study based on a CT scan at postoperative day 3 (without oral and intravenous contrast) and CT scan and CS at day 7. CT scan analysis consisted of assessing contrast and air leakage. In case of doubt, an endoscopy was done.
RESULTS: A diagnosis of anastomotic leak was made in 13 patients (13.4%), in 2 cases before day 7 and in 3 beyond day 7. At day 3, 94 CT scans were performed, but the diagnostic value was poor. In 95 patients with both CS and CT scan at day 7, CS disclosed a leak in 5 of 11, and CT scan was abnormal in 8 of 11. Leakage of contrast and/or presence of mediastinal gas had the best negative predictive value (95.8%). Endoscopy was done in 16 patients with only mediastinal gas at day 7 CT scan. It disclosed a normal anastomosis in 11, fibrin deposits in 4, and a leak in 1.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with CS only, CT at day 7 improves the sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing an anastomotic leak. In case of doubt endoscopy is advisable. This approach provides an accurate assessment of the anastomosis before refeeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19864934     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c1aeb8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hasegawa; Naoshi Kubo; Masaichi Ohira; Katsunobu Sakurai; Takahiro Toyokawa; Yoshito Yamashita; Sadaaki Yamazoe; Kenjiro Kimura; Hisashi Nagahara; Ryosuke Amano; Masatsune Shibutani; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Hiroshi Ohtani; Masakazu Yashiro; Kiyoshi Maeda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Satoshi Ono; Risa Takahata; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Isao Kumano; Yusuke Matsumoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Aiko; Takashi Ichikura; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Author's Reply: Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Sven Plum; Felix Berlth; Till Herbold; Seung-Hun Chon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Anastomotic Leakage after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Endoscopic Treatment.

Authors:  Georg Kähler
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-06-14

6.  Experiences in the management of anastomotic leakages and analysis of the factors affecting leakage healing in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer.

Authors:  Ningning Ding; Yousheng Mao; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Yue Zhao; Ding Yang; Kelin Sun; Guiyu Cheng; Juwei Mu; Qi Xue; Dali Wang; Jun Zhao; Yushun Gao; Xiangyang Liu; Dekang Fang; Jian Li; Yonggang Wang; Jinfeng Huang; Bing Wang; Liangze Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Endoscopic Management of Benign Esophageal Ruptures and Leaks.

Authors:  Milena Di Leo; Roberta Maselli; Elisa Chiara Ferrara; Laura Poliani; Sameer Al Awadhi; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06

8.  The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosoi; Tetsuya Abe; Norihisa Uemura; Eiji Higaki; Ryosuke Kawai; Jiro Kawakami; Byonggu An; Masato Nagino; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  [Perforations near the cardia in benign diseases].

Authors:  W Schröder; J M Leers; M Bludau; T Herbold; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Joshua S Hill; Mark K Reames; James Symanowski; Susie C Hurley; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.