PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of steady-state, high-spatial-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the lower leg, performed with a blood pool contrast agent, with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. In a nonrandomized trial, selective DSA and MR angiography were performed at 3.0 T with a blood pool contrast agent on 22 calves in 20 patients (mean age, 69.4 years +/- 11.3 [standard deviation]), 16 men (mean age, 67.8 years +/- 12.4) and four women (mean age, 75.6 years +/- 3.6 years), to evaluate 352 arterial segments. DSA and MR angiography were performed within 24 hours of each other and directly compared by three experienced, blinded radiologists by using high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiograms. Consensus reading for both DSA and MR angiography served as the reference standard. RESULTS: MR angiography was successful and occurred without serious adverse events in all patients. Seven significantly stenosed and 40 occluded segments were rated equally in both modalities. In three cases, the tibial arteries were shown to be occluded or significantly stenosed at DSA but appeared normal or significantly stenosed at MR angiography. The respective average segment sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.3% (59 of 60), 98% (113.7 of 116), and 98.1% (172.7 of 176) for DSA and 100% (60 of 60), 100% (116 of 116), and 100% (176 of 176) for MR angiography. Steady-state MR angiography was especially useful for the distal peroneal artery and the proximal anterior tibial artery. CONCLUSION: MR angiography performed with blood pool agents has an accuracy comparable with that of selective DSA in the lower leg but with less risk involved. Steady-state imaging performed with blood pool agents facilitates evaluation of MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries.
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of steady-state, high-spatial-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the lower leg, performed with a blood pool contrast agent, with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. In a nonrandomized trial, selective DSA and MR angiography were performed at 3.0 T with a blood pool contrast agent on 22 calves in 20 patients (mean age, 69.4 years +/- 11.3 [standard deviation]), 16 men (mean age, 67.8 years +/- 12.4) and four women (mean age, 75.6 years +/- 3.6 years), to evaluate 352 arterial segments. DSA and MR angiography were performed within 24 hours of each other and directly compared by three experienced, blinded radiologists by using high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiograms. Consensus reading for both DSA and MR angiography served as the reference standard. RESULTS: MR angiography was successful and occurred without serious adverse events in all patients. Seven significantly stenosed and 40 occluded segments were rated equally in both modalities. In three cases, the tibial arteries were shown to be occluded or significantly stenosed at DSA but appeared normal or significantly stenosed at MR angiography. The respective average segment sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.3% (59 of 60), 98% (113.7 of 116), and 98.1% (172.7 of 176) for DSA and 100% (60 of 60), 100% (116 of 116), and 100% (176 of 176) for MR angiography. Steady-state MR angiography was especially useful for the distal peroneal artery and the proximal anterior tibial artery. CONCLUSION: MR angiography performed with blood pool agents has an accuracy comparable with that of selective DSA in the lower leg but with less risk involved. Steady-state imaging performed with blood pool agents facilitates evaluation of MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries.
Authors: Sebastian Niedermayer; Steven Sourbron; Maria Prompona; Clemens Cyran; Maximilian Reiser; Armin Huber Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Christina M Plank; Florian Wolf; Herbert Langenberger; Michael Weber; Dietrich Beitzke; Alfred Stadler; Martin Schillinger; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Karolien Jaspers; Bas Versluis; Tim Leiner; Petra Dijkstra; Marlies Oostendorp; Jolanda M van Golde; Mark J Post; Walter H Backes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240