OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the proposed five-factor structure and invariance of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996) in a sample of physically active breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sample of breast cancer survivors (N=470, Mage=57.3, SD=7.8 years) completed the PTGI and a demographic questionnaire. The factor structure, factorial invariance, and latent mean invariance were tested using maximum likelihood structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Preliminary analyses showed acceptable reliability for the PTGI subscales (alpha<0.83). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the five related factors corresponding to: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life (chi(2) (179)=822.53, CFI=0.97, NNFI=0.96, SRMR=0.05, RMSEA=0.09). Multigroup CFA supported the invariance of the PTGI across age groups, treatment type, time since diagnosis, and time since last treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for (1) the multidimensional nature and factorial validity of the PTGI, and (2) the use of the PTGI in future research examining posttraumatic growth within samples of physically active breast cancer survivors. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the proposed five-factor structure and invariance of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996) in a sample of physically active breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A sample of breast cancer survivors (N=470, Mage=57.3, SD=7.8 years) completed the PTGI and a demographic questionnaire. The factor structure, factorial invariance, and latent mean invariance were tested using maximum likelihood structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Preliminary analyses showed acceptable reliability for the PTGI subscales (alpha<0.83). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the five related factors corresponding to: relating to others, new possibilities, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life (chi(2) (179)=822.53, CFI=0.97, NNFI=0.96, SRMR=0.05, RMSEA=0.09). Multigroup CFA supported the invariance of the PTGI across age groups, treatment type, time since diagnosis, and time since last treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for (1) the multidimensional nature and factorial validity of the PTGI, and (2) the use of the PTGI in future research examining posttraumatic growth within samples of physically active breast cancer survivors. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Suzanne C Danhauer; Gregory B Russell; Richard G Tedeschi; Michelle T Jesse; Tanya Vishnevsky; Kristin Daley; Suzanne Carroll; Kelli N Triplett; Lawrence G Calhoun; Arnie Cann; Bayard L Powell Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2013-03
Authors: Catherine M Sabiston; Shayna Rusticus; Jennifer Brunet; Meghan H McDonough; Valerie Hadd; Anita M Hubley; Peter R E Crocker Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-06-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Julia Gouzman; Miri Cohen; Hasida Ben-Zur; Einat Shacham-Shmueli; Dan Aderka; Nava Siegelmann-Danieli; Alex Beny Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2015-03
Authors: Alfred Künzler; Fridtjof W Nussbeck; Michael T Moser; Guy Bodenmann; Karen Kayser Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Suzanne C Danhauer; L Douglas Case; Richard Tedeschi; Greg Russell; Tanya Vishnevsky; Kelli Triplett; Edward H Ip; Nancy E Avis Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.894