Literature DB >> 20549369

Invariance test of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire: do women with breast cancer interpret this measure differently?

Catherine M Sabiston1, Shayna Rusticus, Jennifer Brunet, Meghan H McDonough, Valerie Hadd, Anita M Hubley, Peter R E Crocker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine whether the meaning and interpretation of body image are similar for breast cancer survivors and women without breast cancer.
METHOD: Women completed the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire--Appearance Scales as part of two studies. There were 469 women with breast cancer and 385 women without breast cancer. Invariance testing was conducted to examine whether the items assessing the body image dimensions were similar, whether the dimensions were interpreted similarly, whether the items were equally salient and meaningful, and whether there were mean differences on the body image dimensions across the two groups.
RESULTS: The meaning and interpretation of body image dimensions related to appearance evaluation and appearance orientation were similar across the groups, yet some group differences were found for overweight preoccupation and body areas satisfaction (and not testable for self-classified weight). Breast cancer survivors reported a small yet significantly higher mean on appearance evaluation and lower mean on appearance orientation compared to the women without breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful comparisons in body image across cancer and non-cancer women can be made using two of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire--Appearance Scales. The overweight preoccupation subscale could be used to assess body image but should not be used if group mean differences are desirable. Assessing satisfaction with body areas across these groups is not recommended and may introduce systematic bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549369     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9680-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  16 in total

1.  A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables.

Authors:  Irini Moustaki
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  The Use Of Analysis Of Covariance Structures For Comparing The Psychometric Properties Of Multiple Variables Across Populations.

Authors:  D A Rock; C E Werts; R L Flaugher
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1978-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches.

Authors:  K G Jöreskog; I Moustaki
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Pat Fobair; Susan L Stewart; Subo Chang; Carol D'Onofrio; Priscilla J Banks; Joan R Bloom
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Psychosocial experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in a dragon boat program: exploring links to positive psychological growth.

Authors:  Catherine M Sabiston; Meghan H McDonough; Peter R E Crocker
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.016

6.  Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Pamela J Goodwin; Robin S McLeod; Rene Dion; Gerald Devins; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  I think therefore I am: perceived ideal weight as a determinant of health.

Authors:  Peter Muennig; Haomiao Jia; Rufina Lee; Erica Lubetkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Sexual Adjustment and Body Image Scale (SABIS): a new measure for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E Jane Dalton; Valaire Naisbitt Rasmussen; Catherine C Classen; Mareile Grumann; Oxana Gronskaya Palesh; Julia Zarcone; Helena C Kraemer; Jeffrey J Kirshner; Lauren K Colman; Gary R Morrow; David Spiegel
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joan R Bloom; Susan L Stewart; Subo Chang; Priscilla J Banks
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: influence of treatment and patient characteristics.

Authors:  M T King; P Kenny; A Shiell; J Hall; J Boyages
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies.

Authors:  Vicky Lehmann; Mariët Hagedoorn; Marrit A Tuinman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Factors Influencing Body Image in Women with Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Maedeh Rezaei; Forouzan Elyasi; Ghasem Janbabai; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Zeinab Hamzehgardeshi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 3.  Bio-psycho-social factors affecting sexual self-concept: A systematic review.

Authors:  Robabeh Potki; Tayebe Ziaei; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Zohreh Shahhosseini
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-09-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.