OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinally the effect of infant orthopedics (IO) on dentofacial cephalometric variables in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients from 4 to 6 years of age. DESIGN: Prospective two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial in three cleft palate centers in The Netherlands (Dutchcleft trial). PATIENTS: Fifty-four children with complete UCLP. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided randomly into two groups. Half of the patients (IO+) had IO until surgical closure of the soft palate at the age of +/-52 weeks; the other half (IO-) received no intervention. MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cephalometric values representing soft tissue, hard tissue, and dental structures, measured on lateral headfilms made at 4 and 6 years of age. RESULTS: In the IO+ group, 21 patients were analyzed; in the IO- group, 20 patients were analyzed at age 4 and 22 at age 6. No differences were found between IO+ and IO-, except for two measurements: The interincisal angle was larger and the mentolabial angle was smaller in the IO+ group. CONCLUSIONS: For infants with UCLP whose surgical management included soft palate repair at 12 months and delayed hard palate closure, cephalometric outcomes at ages 4 and 6 provide no indication for the type of IO used in this study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinally the effect of infant orthopedics (IO) on dentofacial cephalometric variables in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients from 4 to 6 years of age. DESIGN: Prospective two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial in three cleft palate centers in The Netherlands (Dutchcleft trial). PATIENTS: Fifty-four children with complete UCLP. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were divided randomly into two groups. Half of the patients (IO+) had IO until surgical closure of the soft palate at the age of +/-52 weeks; the other half (IO-) received no intervention. MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cephalometric values representing soft tissue, hard tissue, and dental structures, measured on lateral headfilms made at 4 and 6 years of age. RESULTS: In the IO+ group, 21 patients were analyzed; in the IO- group, 20 patients were analyzed at age 4 and 22 at age 6. No differences were found between IO+ and IO-, except for two measurements: The interincisal angle was larger and the mentolabial angle was smaller in the IO+ group. CONCLUSIONS: For infants with UCLP whose surgical management included soft palate repair at 12 months and delayed hard palate closure, cephalometric outcomes at ages 4 and 6 provide no indication for the type of IO used in this study.
Authors: Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J Maal; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Priyanka Niranjane; R H Kamble; S Pallavi Diagavane; S Sunita Shrivastav; Puneet Batra; S D Vasudevan; Pushkar Patil Journal: Indian J Plast Surg Date: 2014 Sep-Dec
Authors: Lucas M Ritschl; Veronika Heinrich; Florian D Grill; Maximilian Roth; Dennis M Hedderich; Andrea Rau; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Franz X Bauer; Denys J Loeffelbein Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2018-07-17