Literature DB >> 19858475

Interdependence of movement and anatomy persists when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb.

G Lorimer Moseley1, P Brugger.   

Abstract

The feeling we have of our own body, sometimes called "body image," is fundamental to self-awareness. However, by altering sensory input, the body image can be modified into impossible configurations. Can impossible movements of the body image be conjured solely via internally generated mechanisms, and, if so, do the structural characteristics of the body image modify to accommodate the new movements? We encouraged seven amputees with a vivid phantom arm to learn to perform a phantom wrist movement that defied normal anatomical constraints. Four reported success. Learning the impossible movement coincided in time with a profound change in the body image of the arm, including a sense of ownership and agency over a modified wrist joint. Remarkably, some previous movements and functional tasks involving the phantom arm became more difficult once the shift in body image had occurred. Crucially, these introspective reports were corroborated by robust empirical data from motor imagery tasks, about which amputees were naïve and to which assessors were blind. These results provide evidence that: a completely novel body image can be constructed solely by internally generated mechanisms; that the interdependence between movement repertoire and structural constraints of the body persists even when the structural constraints imparted by the body do not--the body image we construct still constrains imagined movements; and that motor learning does not necessarily need sensory feedback from the body or external feedback about task performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19858475      PMCID: PMC2774040          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907151106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Do training diaries affect and reflect adherence to home programs?

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

Review 2.  Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix.

Authors:  R Melzack
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; C M Phegan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps.

Authors:  D V Buonomano; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  [Phantom limbs after amputation and in congenital missing limbs].

Authors:  K Poeck
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1969-11-14       Impact factor: 0.628

8.  Perception of impossible limb positions induced by tendon vibration.

Authors:  B Craske
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications.

Authors:  Marco Iacoboni; John C Mazziotta
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Review of motor and phantom-related imagery.

Authors:  William S Anderson; Frederick A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Relative contributions of spatial weighting, explicit knowledge and proprioception to hand localisation during positional ambiguity.

Authors:  Valeria Bellan; Helen R Gilpin; Tasha R Stanton; Lilja K Dagsdóttir; Alberto Gallace; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  TechnoBrainBodies-in-Cultures: An Intersectional Case.

Authors:  Sigrid Schmitz
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-04-27

4.  Strong biomechanical constraints on young children's mental imagery of hands.

Authors:  Kaoru Sekiyama; Toshiro Kinoshita; Takahiro Soshi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  No Telescoping Effect with Dual Tendon Vibration.

Authors:  Valeria Bellan; Sarah B Wallwork; Tasha R Stanton; Carlo Reverberi; Alberto Gallace; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Voluntary Out-of-Body Experience: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Andra M Smith; Claude Messier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Out of my real body: cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders.

Authors:  Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Phantom limb perception interferes with motor imagery after unilateral upper-limb amputation.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Lyu; Xiaoli Guo; Robin Bekrater-Bodmann; Herta Flor; Shanbao Tong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Feeling stiffness in the back: a protective perceptual inference in chronic back pain.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley; Arnold Y L Wong; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review.

Authors:  Niclas Braun; Stefan Debener; Nadine Spychala; Edith Bongartz; Peter Sörös; Helge H O Müller; Alexandra Philipsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.