Literature DB >> 27778047

Relative contributions of spatial weighting, explicit knowledge and proprioception to hand localisation during positional ambiguity.

Valeria Bellan1,2,3,4, Helen R Gilpin1,2, Tasha R Stanton1,2,5, Lilja K Dagsdóttir6,7, Alberto Gallace3,4, G Lorimer Moseley8,9,10.   

Abstract

When vision and proprioception are rendered incongruent during a hand localisation task, vision is initially weighted more than proprioception in determining location, and proprioception gains more weighting over time. However, it is not known whether, under these incongruency conditions, particular areas of space are also weighted more heavily than others, nor whether explicit knowledge of the sensory incongruence (i.e. disconfirming the perceived location of the hand) modulates the effect. Here, we hypothesised that both non-informative inputs coming from one side of space and explicit knowledge of sensory incongruence would modulate perceived location of the limb. Specifically, we expected spatial weighting to shift hand localisation towards the weighted area of space, and we expected greater weighting of proprioceptive input once perceived location was demonstrated to be inaccurate. We manipulated spatial weighting using an established auditory cueing paradigm (Experiment 1, n = 18) and sensory incongruence using the 'disappearing hand trick' (Experiment 2, n = 9). Our first hypothesis was not supported-spatial weighting did not modulate hand localisation. Our second hypothesis was only partially supported-disconfirmation of hand position did lead to more accurate localisations, even if participants were still unaware of their hand position. This raised the possibility that rather than disconfirmation, a simple movement of the hand in view could update the sensory-motor system, by immediately increasing the weighting of proprioceptive input relative to visual input. This third hypothesis was then confirmed (Experiment 3, n = 9). These results suggest that hand localisation is robust in the face of differential weighting of space, but open to modulation in a modality-specific manner, when one sense (vision) is rendered inaccurate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body representation; Hand localisation; Proprioception; Self-localisation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27778047     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4782-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

Review 1.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Eye rotation does not contribute to shifts in subjective straight ahead: implications for prism adaptation and neglect.

Authors:  Roger Newport; Catherine Preston; Rachel Pearce; Roxanne Holton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Limb-specific autonomic dysfunction in complex regional pain syndrome modulated by wearing prism glasses.

Authors:  Lorimer G Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Flavia Di Pietro; Charles Spence; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Contraction of body representation induced by proprioceptive conflict.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Marjolein P M Kammers; Hiroaki Gomi; Manos Tsakiris; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; M H Clark; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

7.  Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Emily Reid; Daniel Harvie; Rohan Miegel; Charles Spence; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Spatially defined modulation of skin temperature and hand ownership of both hands in patients with unilateral complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Space-based, but not arm-based, shift in tactile processing in complex regional pain syndrome and its relationship to cooling of the affected limb.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  4 in total

1.  Where is my arm? Investigating the link between complex regional pain syndrome and poor localisation of the affected limb.

Authors:  Valeria Bellan; Felicity A Braithwaite; Erica M Wilkinson; Tasha R Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Vibrotactile information improves proprioceptive reaching target localization.

Authors:  Laura Mikula; Sofia Sahnoun; Laure Pisella; Gunnar Blohm; Aarlenne Zein Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Recalibration of hand position sense during unconscious active and passive movement.

Authors:  Zakaryah Abdulkarim; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The disappearing hand: vestibular stimulation does not improve hand localisation.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; Valeria Bellan; Mohammad Shohag; Danny Camfferman; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.