Literature DB >> 19857946

Asthmatics and ex-smokers respond early, heavy smokers respond late to mailed surveys in Italy.

Giuseppe Verlato1, Roberto Melotti, Mario Olivieri, Angelo Corsico, Massimiliano Bugiani, Simone Accordini, Simona Villani, Enrica Migliore, Alessandra Marinoni, Pietro Pirina, Laura Carrozzi, Oscar Bortolami, Marta Rava, Roberto de Marco.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Response to mailed epidemiological surveys has decreased in recent decades. Since subjects with respiratory symptoms are usually early responders to surveys performed in Southern Europe, this trend could bias prevalence estimates. The present study aimed at evaluating the impact of non-response bias on prevalence estimates of respiratory symptoms and smoking habits.
METHODS: In 9 centres, participating in the Italian Study on Asthma in Young Adults (ISAYA), random samples of people aged 20-45 years were administered a mailed questionnaire between 1998 and 2000. Non-responders were contacted again first by mail and then by phone. Cumulative response percentage was 30.5%, 52.4% and 72.7% (18,873/25,969), respectively, after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd contact.
RESULTS: The prevalence of self-reported current asthma, asthma-like symptoms, and chronic cough/phlegm was more than halved from the first contact (5.6%, 17.8%, 14.6% respectively) to the third contact (2.7%, 6.4%, 6.9%). This pattern was less pronounced when considering allergic rhinitis and past asthma, whose prevalence decreased, respectively, from 21.5% to 15.6% and from 3.5% to 2.6%. At the same time the proportion of current smokers increased from 29.2% to 38%, while the proportion of ex-smokers decreased from 16.5% to 10.1%. In a multinomial logistic model current asthma, asthma-like symptoms, chronic cough/phlegm and smoking habits, and to a lower extent past asthma and allergic rhinitis, were significant predictors of late response.
CONCLUSIONS: In Italy when response percentage is low, the prevalence of current asthma, chronic cough/phlegm and ex-smokers is overestimated, while the proportion of current smokers is underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19857946     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  13 in total

1.  Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Jade A Anderson; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Exploring the validity of the continuum of resistance model for discriminating early from late and non-uptake of colorectal cancer screening: implications for the design of invitation and reminder letters.

Authors:  Tess Gregory; Stephen R Cole; Carlene J Wilson; Ingrid H Flight; Ian T Zajac; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-12

3.  The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey.

Authors:  Jessica Meiklejohn; Jennie Connor; Kypros Kypri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in a prospective cohort study of bicycle crash injuries.

Authors:  Sandar Tin Tin; Alistair Woodward; Shanthi Ameratunga
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking habits are still increasing in Italy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Verlato; Simone Accordini; Giang Nguyen; Pierpaolo Marchetti; Lucia Cazzoletti; Marcello Ferrari; Leonardo Antonicelli; Francesco Attena; Valeria Bellisario; Roberto Bono; Lamberto Briziarelli; Lucio Casali; Angelo Guido Corsico; Alessandro Fois; MariaGrazia Panico; Pavilio Piccioni; Pietro Pirina; Simona Villani; Gabriele Nicolini; Roberto de Marco
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms as compared to the general population.

Authors:  F De Santi; G Zoppini; F Locatelli; E Finocchio; V Cappa; M Dauriz; G Verlato
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  Bias estimation in study design: a meta-epidemiological analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Saerom Youn; Shannon Avery Wong; Caitlin Chrystoja; George Tomlinson; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Chaim M Bell; Anna R Gagliardi; Nancy N Baxter; Julie Takata; Lakhbir Sandhu; David Robert Urbach
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Longterm follow-up in European respiratory health studies - patterns and implications.

Authors:  Ane Johannessen; Giuseppe Verlato; Bryndis Benediktsdottir; Bertil Forsberg; Karl Franklin; Thorarinn Gislason; Mathias Holm; Christer Janson; Rain Jögi; Eva Lindberg; Ferenc Macsali; Ernst Omenaas; Francisco Gomez Real; Eirunn Waatevik Saure; Vivi Schlünssen; Torben Sigsgaard; Trude Duelien Skorge; Cecilie Svanes; Kjell Torén; Marie Waatevik; Roy Miodini Nilsen; Roberto de Marco
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Non-responders in a quitline evaluation are more likely to be smokers - a drop-out and long-term follow-up study of the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline.

Authors:  Eva Nohlert; John Öhrvik; Ásgeir R Helgason
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.600

10.  Non-response in a cross-sectional study of respiratory health in Norway.

Authors:  Regine Abrahamsen; Martin Veel Svendsen; Paul K Henneberger; Gølin Finckenhagen Gundersen; Kjell Torén; Johny Kongerud; Anne Kristin Møller Fell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.