Literature DB >> 19857803

Contrast-enhanced CT colonography with 64-slice MDCT compared to endoscopic colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after colorectal cancer resection.

Marianne Michal Amitai1, Herma Fidder, Benjamin Avidan, Orith Portnoy, Sara Apter, Eli Konen, Marjorie Hertz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seventy percent of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases are potential candidates for curative surgery, but after resection, in 30%, the tumor will recur. Postoperative follow-up includes endoscopic colonoscopy (EC) and computed tomography (CT). There have been only a few publications on the use of contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CECTC) in the follow-up of these patients.
METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients after resection of colorectal cancer underwent CECTC and EC on the same day. CECTC studies were reviewed for identification of strictures, recurrence, polyps and metastases.
RESULTS: The anastomosis was identified in 96% of patients on CECTC and in 82% on endoscopic colonoscopy. One stricture was identified by both techniques. One extraluminal recurrence was depicted only on CECTC. Sensitivity in detecting polyps was per polyp 93% and per patient 100%.
CONCLUSION: CECTC performed on a 64-slice multidetector CT is reliable in imaging the postoperative colon for the follow-up of patients after resection of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19857803     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  10 in total

1.  Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Perry J Pickhardt; David H Bruining; Kristin Edwards; Joel G Fletcher; Marc J Gollub; Eileen M Keenan; Sonia S Kupfer; Tianyu Li; Sam J Lubner; Arnold J Markowitz; Eric A Ross
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  CT colonography for surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  François Porté; Mallikarjuna Uppara; George Malietzis; Omar Faiz; Steve Halligan; Thanos Athanasiou; David Burling
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

6.  Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Jaap Stoker; Onofre Alarcon; Federico Barbaro; Davide Bellini; Michael Bretthauer; Margriet C De Haan; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Monika Ferlitsch; Steve Halligan; Emma Helbren; Mikael Hellstrom; Ernst J Kuipers; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Emanuele Neri; Lucio Petruzziello; Andrew Plumb; Daniele Regge; Stuart A Taylor; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Yield and Cost-effectiveness of Computed Tomography Colonography Versus Colonoscopy for Post Colorectal Cancer Surveillance.

Authors:  J Robert Beck; Eric A Ross; Karen M Kuntz; Jonah Popp; Ann G Zauber; Joseph Bland; David S Weinberg
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 8.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Polyisoprenylated methylated protein methyl esterase is both sensitive to curcumin and overexpressed in colorectal cancer: implications for chemoprevention and treatment.

Authors:  Felix Amissah; Randolph Duverna; Byron J Aguilar; Rosemary A Poku; Nazarius S Lamango
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Prospective Trial Evaluating the Surgical Anastomosis at One-Year Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy and Implications for Patient Care.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Kristin Edwards; David H Bruining; Marc Gollub; Sonja Kupfer; Sam J Lubner; David H Kim; Eric Ross; Eileen Keenan; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.585

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.