Literature DB >> 19856963

The structural basis of pregnane X receptor binding promiscuity.

Chi-Ho Ngan1, Dmitri Beglov, Aleksandra N Rudnitskaya, Dima Kozakov, David J Waxman, Sandor Vajda.   

Abstract

The steroid and xenobiotic-responsive human pregnane X receptor (PXR) binds a broad range of structurally diverse compounds. The structures of the apo and ligand-bound forms of PXR are very similar, in contrast to most promiscuous proteins that generally adapt their shape to different ligands. We investigated the structural origins of PXR's recognition promiscuity using computational solvent mapping, a technique developed for the identification and characterization of hot spots, i.e., regions of the protein surface that are major contributors to the binding free energy. Results reveal that the smooth and nearly spherical binding site of PXR has a well-defined hot spot structure, with four hot spots located on four different sides of the pocket and a fifth close to its center. Three of these hot spots are already present in the ligand-free protein. The most important hot spot is defined by three structurally and sequentially conserved residues, W299, F288, and Y306. This largely hydrophobic site is not very specific and interacts with all known PXR ligands. Depending on their sizes and shapes, individual PXR ligands extend into two, three, or four more hot spot regions. The large number of potential arrangements within the binding site explains why PXR is able to accommodate a large variety of compounds. All five hot spots include at least one important residue, which is conserved in all mammalian PXRs, suggesting that the hot spot locations have remained largely invariant during mammalian evolution. The same side chains also show a high level of structural conservation across hPXR structures. However, each of the hPXR hot spots also includes residues with moveable side chains, further increasing the size variation in ligands that PXR can bind. Results also suggest a unique signal transduction mechanism between the PXR homodimerization interface and its coactivator binding site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19856963      PMCID: PMC2789303          DOI: 10.1021/bi901578n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  48 in total

Review 1.  A ligand-based approach to understanding selectivity of nuclear hormone receptors PXR, CAR, FXR, LXRalpha, and LXRbeta.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Leonid Mirny; Erin G Schuetz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Promiscuity: what protects us, perplexes us.

Authors:  Matthew R Redinbo
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Computational solvent mapping reveals the importance of local conformational changes for broad substrate specificity in mammalian cytochromes P450.

Authors:  Karl H Clodfelter; David J Waxman; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Identification of substrate binding sites in enzymes by computational solvent mapping.

Authors:  Michael Silberstein; Sheldon Dennis; Lawrence Brown; Tamas Kortvelyesi; Karl Clodfelter; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface.

Authors:  T Clackson; J A Wells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells.

Authors:  P Panina-Bordignon; A Tan; A Termijtelen; S Demotz; G Corradin; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 7.  The nuclear pregnane X receptor regulates xenobiotic detoxification.

Authors:  Steven A Kliewer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Environmental phthalate monoesters activate pregnane X receptor-mediated transcription.

Authors:  Christopher H Hurst; David J Waxman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Coactivator binding promotes the specific interaction between ligand and the pregnane X receptor.

Authors:  Ryan E Watkins; Paula R Davis-Searles; Mill H Lambert; Matthew R Redinbo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Highly chlorinated PCBs inhibit the human xenobiotic response mediated by the steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR).

Authors:  Michelle M Tabb; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Felix Grün; Changcheng Zhou; William J Welsh; Bruce Blumberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  34 in total

1.  Hot spot analysis for driving the development of hits into leads in fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  David R Hall; Chi Ho Ngan; Brandon S Zerbe; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Evolutionary origins of the estrogen signaling system: insights from amphioxus.

Authors:  G V Callard; A M Tarrant; A Novillo; P Yacci; L Ciaccia; S Vajda; G-Y Chuang; D Kozakov; S R Greytak; S Sawyer; C Hoover; K A Cotter
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.292

3.  Domain motion and interdomain hot spots in a multidomain enzyme.

Authors:  Gwo-Yu Chuang; Ritcha Mehra-Chaudhary; Chi-Ho Ngan; Brandon S Zerbe; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Lesa J Beamer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes by xenobiotic receptors: PXR and CAR.

Authors:  Antonia H Tolson; Hongbing Wang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Widespread epigenetic changes to the enhancer landscape of mouse liver induced by a specific xenobiotic agonist ligand of the nuclear receptor CAR.

Authors:  Andy Rampersaud; Nicholas J Lodato; Aram Shin; David J Waxman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Pregnane X receptor- and CYP3A4-humanized mouse models and their applications.

Authors:  Jie Cheng; Xiaochao Ma; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  BLIP-II Employs Differential Hotspot Residues To Bind Structurally Similar Staphylococcus aureus PBP2a and Class A β-Lactamases.

Authors:  Carolyn J Adamski; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Regulation of the cytosolic sulfotransferases by nuclear receptors.

Authors:  Melissa Runge-Morris; Thomas A Kocarek; Charles N Falany
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.518

9.  Exploring the Carbamazepine Interaction with Human Pregnane X Receptor and Effect on ABCC2 Using in Vitro and in Silico Approach.

Authors:  Gurpreet K Grewal; Khuraijam D Singh; Neha Kanojia; Chitra Rawat; Samiksha Kukal; Ajay Jajodia; Anshika Singhal; Richa Misra; Selvaraman Nagamani; Karthikeyan Muthusamy; Ritushree Kukreti
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Evaluation of computational docking to identify pregnane X receptor agonists in the ToxCast database.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Erica J Reschly; Madhukumar Venkatesh; Sridhar Mani; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.