Literature DB >> 19856092

Women's sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: the role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history.

Zoë D Peterson1, Erick Janssen, Ellen Laan.   

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated that women do not show a "category-specific" genital response to erotic stimuli. That is, on average, heterosexual and lesbian women are indistinguishable in terms of their physiological genital responses to heterosexual versus lesbian erotica. In two studies with heterosexual women (n = 28 for Study 1; n = 30 for Study 2) and lesbians (n = 24 for Study 1; n = 25 for Study 2), results confirmed that, on average, women did not show category-specific genital responses or category-specific subjective sexual arousal. However, there was evidence of notable within-group variability; many women did respond to the stimuli in a category-specific manner. Heterosexual women were more likely than lesbian women to demonstrate category-specificity. Findings also revealed that category-specificity was associated with multiple factors, including affective responses to the erotic stimuli and sexual history. Results of this study highlight the complexity of women's sexual identities and sexual responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19856092     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9546-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of female sexual arousal in forensic populations.

Authors:  Natasha M Knack; Lisa Murphy; Rebekah Ranger; Cindy Meston; J Paul Fedoroff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Prepared for Pleasure? An Alternative Perspective on the Preparation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-09

3.  Sexual Orientation Across Porn Use, Sexual Fantasy, and In-Person Sexuality: Visualizing Branchedness and Coincidence via Sexual Configurations Theory.

Authors:  Aki M Gormezano; Emily A Harris; Stéphanie E M Gauvin; Jude Pinto; Greg van Anders; Sari M van Anders
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Straight but Not Narrow; Within-Gender Variation in the Gender-Specificity of Women's Sexual Response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Katrina N Bouchard; Amanda D Timmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gender-Specificity of Initial and Controlled Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Androphilic Women and Gynephilic Men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Can the Vaginal Photoplethysmograph and Its Associated Methodology Be Used to Assess Anal Vasocongestion in Women and Men?

Authors:  Megan L Sawatsky; Kelly D Suschinsky; Sofija Lavrinsek; Meredith L Chivers; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-18

8.  Olfactory performance is predicted by individual sex-atypicality, but not sexual orientation.

Authors:  Lenka Nováková; Jaroslava Varella Valentová; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sexual Fantasies and Stereotypical Gender Roles: The Influence of Sexual Orientation, Gender and Social Pressure in a Sample of Italian Young-Adults.

Authors:  Carla Tortora; Giulio D'Urso; Filippo M Nimbi; Ugo Pace; Daniela Marchetti; Lilybeth Fontanesi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.