Literature DB >> 19855378

p53 overexpression in morphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas correlates with adverse clinical outcomes.

Karuna Garg1, Mario M Leitao, Christine A Wynveen, Gabriel L Sica, Jinru Shia, Weiji Shi, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

The distinction between uterine serous and endometrioid carcinomas can usually be achieved by morphologic examination alone. However, there are occasional 'morphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas' that show overlapping serous and endometrioid features and defy histologic classification. The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of p53 overexpression using immunohistochemistry in such tumors. Related aims included (1) assessing interobserver diagnostic concordance for histologic subclassification of these tumors using a panel of pathologists with and without gynecologic pathology expertise and (2) elucidating the histologic features that correlate with p53 status. Thirty-five such cases were identified during the study period. p53 overexpression was seen in 17 of 35 cases. Tumors with p53 overexpression were associated with a significantly inferior progression-free survival and disease-specific survival compared with those that lacked p53 overexpression (3-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival were 94 and 100% in patients with no p53 overexpression, and 52 and 54% in patients with p53 overexpression; P=0.02 and 0.003, respectively). The consensus diagnosis rendered by gynecologic pathologists was predictive of disease-specific survival (P=0.002), but not progression-free survival (P=0.11). Although the interobserver diagnostic concordance (kappa=0.70) was substantial for gynecologic pathologists, and highly associated with p53 status (77% of 'favor serous' cases showed p53 overexpression, whereas only 25% of 'favor endometrioid' cases showed p53 overexpression; P=0.005), the concordance between the consensus diagnosis of the two specialized pathologists versus each of three non-specialized pathologists was poor (kappa=0.13-0.25). The histologic feature that correlated most with p53 overexpression was the presence of diffuse high nuclear grade. p53 immunohistochemistry assays in morphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas are roughly as clinically informative as gynecologic pathology consultation and can be helpful for prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision making in difficult endometrial carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855378     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  29 in total

1.  The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Deborah F DeLair; Kathleen A Burke; Pier Selenica; Raymond S Lim; Sasinya N Scott; Sumit Middha; Abhinita S Mohanty; Donavan T Cheng; Michael F Berger; Robert A Soslow; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 2.  Current status of molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  H M J Werner; H B Salvesen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and matrix metalloproteinase-2 overexpression is associated with loss of hormone receptor expression and poor prognosis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Ning Shen; Shu-Yan Yang; Ling Zhao; Yong-Mei Guan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Implication of K-ras and p53 in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis in Tunisian population cohort.

Authors:  Chaar Ines; Ounissi Donia; Boughriba Rahma; Azza Ben Ammar; Amara Sameh; Taher Khalfallah; Ben Hmida Abdelmajid; Mzabi Sabeh; Bouraoui Saadia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-25

Review 5.  [Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 6.  [New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  The genomics and genetics of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea J O'Hara; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Adv Genomics Genet       Date:  2012-03

9.  Application of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Diagnostics to Clinically Relevant Problems in Endometrial Cancer Bojana Djordjevic, Shannon Westin, Russell R. Broaddus.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Shannon Westin; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Prognostic importance of DNA ploidy in non-endometrioid, high-risk endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.