Literature DB >> 19855332

Acute effects of various whole body vibration frequencies on 1RM in trained and untrained subjects.

Bent R Rønnestad1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of whole body vibration (WBV) at different vibration frequencies on 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in recreationally strength trained subjects and untrained subjects. While performing a 1RM test in half squat, trained (8 men) and untrained (5 men and 3 women) subjects were randomly exposed to WBV with a frequency of 20 Hz, 35 Hz, 50 Hz (amplitude, 3 mm), or control conditions with no vibration. 1RM in half squat was assessed in a Smith Machine while subjects were standing on a vibration platform. Both untrained and recreationally strength trained subjects increased their 1RM at a vibration frequency of 50 Hz compared with no vibration (p < 0.05), and untrained subjects increased their 1RM to a larger extent than recreationally trained subjects (8.7% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.05). However, there was no difference in 1RM while vibrating at a frequency of 20 Hz and 35 Hz compared with no vibrations in either of the groups. In conclusion, WBV with a frequency of 50 Hz increases 1RM in both recreationally strength trained and untrained subjects, whereas vibration frequencies of 20 Hz and 35 Hz do not have this effect. Untrained subjects increased their 1RM at WBV at 50 Hz to a larger extent than recreationally strength trained subjects. Therefore, if the purpose is to increase the stimulus to the neuromuscular system to a greater extent than traditional strength training, the WBV frequency should be 50 Hz and the exercises should be heavily loaded (as in traditional strength training).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855332     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8652d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  In-season strength maintenance training increases well-trained cyclists' performance.

Authors:  Bent R Rønnestad; Ernst Albin Hansen; Truls Raastad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Acute bone marker responses to whole-body vibration and resistance exercise in young women.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Carmen Chrisman; Jessica Smith; Kaelin C Young; Harshvardhan Singh; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  EFFECT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATION GENERATED IN OSCILLATING/VIBRATORY PLATFORM ON THE CONCENTRATION OF PLASMA BIOMARKERS AND ON THE WEIGHT IN RATS.

Authors:  Éric Heleno Freire Ferreira Frederico; Danúbia da Cunha de Sá-Caputo; Eloá Moreira-Marconi; Carlos Alberto Sampaio Guimarães; André Luiz Bandeira Dionísio Cardoso; Carla da Fontoura Dionello; Danielle Soares Morel; Cintia Renata Sousa-Gonçalves; Laisa Liana Paineiras-Domingos; Rebeca Graça Costa Cavalcanti; Nasser Ribeiro Asad; Pedro Jesus Marin; Mario Bernardo-Filho
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-07-07

5.  Comparison of Short-Sprint and Heavy Strength Training on Cycling Performance.

Authors:  Morten Kristoffersen; Øyvind Sandbakk; Bent R Rønnestad; Hilde Gundersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The effects of two different frequencies of whole-body vibration on knee extensors strength in healthy young volunteers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Esmaeilzadeh; M Akpinar; S Polat; A Yildiz; A Oral
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.