Literature DB >> 19855003

Elevating the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation as a strategy to kill tumor cells.

Aniek Janssen1, Geert J P L Kops, René H Medema.   

Abstract

The mitotic checkpoint has evolved to prevent chromosome mis-segregations by delaying mitosis when unattached chromosomes are present. Inducing severe chromosome segregation errors by ablating the mitotic checkpoint causes cell death. Here we have analyzed the consequences of gradual increases in chromosome segregation errors on the viability of tumor cells and normal human fibroblasts. Partial reduction of essential mitotic checkpoint components in four tumor cell lines caused mild chromosome mis-segregations, but no lethality. These cells were, however, remarkably more sensitive to low doses of taxol, which enhanced the amount and severity of chromosome segregation errors. Sensitization to taxol was achieved by reducing levels of Mps1 or BubR1, proteins having dual roles in checkpoint activation and chromosome alignment, but not by reducing Mad2, functioning solely in the mitotic checkpoint. Moreover, we find that untransformed human fibroblasts with reduced Mps1 levels could not be sensitized to sublethal doses of taxol. Thus, targeting the mitotic checkpoint and chromosome alignment simultaneously may selectively kill tumor cells by enhancing chromosome mis-segregations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855003      PMCID: PMC2776415          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904343106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

Review 1.  Stuck in division or passing through: what happens when cells cannot satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder; Helder Maiato
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Ablation of the spindle assembly checkpoint by a compound targeting Mps1.

Authors:  Marc Schmidt; Yemima Budirahardja; Rob Klompmaker; René H Medema
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Does aneuploidy cause cancer?

Authors:  Beth A A Weaver; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Low concentrations of taxol cause mitotic delay followed by premature dissociation of p55CDC from Mad2 and BubR1 and abrogation of the spindle checkpoint, leading to aneuploidy.

Authors:  Amy E Ikui; Chia-Ping Huang Yang; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Susan Band Horwitz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression.

Authors:  Patrick Meraldi; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Partial downregulation of MAD1 causes spindle checkpoint inactivation and aneuploidy, but does not confer resistance towards taxol.

Authors:  Anne Kienitz; Celia Vogel; Ivonne Morales; Rolf Müller; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Beth A A Weaver; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Weakened spindle checkpoint with reduced BubR1 expression in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma cell line SKOV3-TR30.

Authors:  Yunfeng Fu; Dafeng Ye; Huaizeng Chen; Weiguo Lu; Feng Ye; Xing Xie
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression.

Authors:  Monika I Mayr; Stefan Hümmer; Jenny Bormann; Tamara Grüner; Sarah Adio; Guenther Woehlke; Thomas U Mayer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  141 in total

1.  Cellular abundance of Mps1 and the role of its carboxyl terminal tail in substrate recruitment.

Authors:  Tingting Sun; Xiaomei Yang; Wei Wang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Quanbin Xu; Songcheng Zhu; Robert Kuchta; Guanjun Chen; Xuedong Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Up-regulation of the mitotic checkpoint component Mad1 causes chromosomal instability and resistance to microtubule poisons.

Authors:  Sean D Ryan; Eric M C Britigan; Lauren M Zasadil; Kristen Witte; Anjon Audhya; Avtar Roopra; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chromosomal instability upregulates interferon in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Robert F Lera; Rachel E Yan; Fen Guo; Kim Oxendine; Vanessa L Horner; Yang Hu; Jun Wan; Ryan J Mattison; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; David Endesfelder; Marco R Novelli; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Samuel F Bakhoum; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  Selective inhibition of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell growth by the mitotic MPS1 kinase inhibitor NMS-P715.

Authors:  Roger B Slee; Brenda R Grimes; Ruchi Bansal; Jesse Gore; Corinne Blackburn; Lyndsey Brown; Rachel Gasaway; Jaesik Jeong; Jose Victorino; Keith L March; Riccardo Colombo; Brittney-Shea Herbert; Murray Korc
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Constitutive Cdk2 activity promotes aneuploidy while altering the spindle assembly and tetraploidy checkpoints.

Authors:  Stephan C Jahn; Patrick E Corsino; Bradley J Davis; Mary E Law; Peter Nørgaard; Brian K Law
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Chromosomal heterogeneity and instability characterize pediatric medulloblastoma cell lines and affect neoplastic phenotype.

Authors:  Angel Mauricio Castro-Gamero; Kleiton Silva Borges; Regia Caroline Lira; Augusto Faria Andrade; Paola Fernanda Fedatto; Gustavo Alencastro Veiga Cruzeiro; Ricardo Bonfim Silva; Aparecida Maria Fontes; Elvis Terci Valera; Michael Bobola; Carlos Alberto Scrideli; Luiz Gonzaga Tone
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 10.  Engaging Anaphase Catastrophe Mechanisms to Eradicate Aneuploid Cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Kawakami; Lisa Maria Mustachio; Xi Liu; Ethan Dmitrovsky
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.