Literature DB >> 19854988

Evidence for parent-of-origin effects on genetic variability of beef traits.

N Neugebauer1, I Räder, H J Schild, D Zimmer, N Reinsch.   

Abstract

Imprinted genes are involved in many aspects of development in mammals, plants, and perhaps birds and may play a role in growth and carcass composition of slaughter animals. In the presence of genomic imprinting the expression and, consequently, the effect on the phenotype of maternal and paternal alleles are different. For genetic evaluation genomic imprinting can be accounted for by incorporating 2 additive genetic effects per animal; the first corresponds to a paternal and the second to a maternal expression pattern of imprinted genes. This model holds whatever the mode of imprinting may be: paternal or maternal, full or partial, or any combination thereof. A set of slaughter data from 65,233 German Simmental fattening bulls was analyzed with respect to the relative importance of the genetic imprinting variance. Besides slaughter weight, net daily BW gain, and killing out percentage, there were 22 other traits describing the carcass composition. The latter traits were evaluated by automatic video-imaging devices and were composed of weights of valuable cuts as well as fat and meatiness grade. The number of ancestors in the pedigree was 356,880. Genomic imprinting significantly contributed to the genetic variance of 10 traits, with estimated proportions between 8 and 25% of the total additive genetic variance. For 6 of these traits, the maternal contribution to the imprinting variance was larger than the paternal, whereas for all other traits the reverse was true. Fat grade only showed a paternal contribution to the imprinting variance. Estimates of animal model heritabilities of automatic video-imaging-recorded carcass traits ranged between 20 and 30%.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854988     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Genome Scan for Parent-of-Origin QTL Effects on Bovine Growth and Carcass Traits.

Authors:  Ikhide G Imumorin; Eun-Hee Kim; Yun-Mi Lee; Dirk-Jan De Koning; Johan A van Arendonk; Marcos De Donato; Jeremy F Taylor; Jong-Joo Kim
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Mendelian sampling covariability of marker effects and genetic values.

Authors:  Sarah Bonk; Manuela Reichelt; Friedrich Teuscher; Dierck Segelke; Norbert Reinsch
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Motohide Nishio; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Partitioning Phenotypic Variance Due to Parent-of-Origin Effects Using Genomic Relatedness Matrices.

Authors:  Charles Laurin; Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Gibran Hemani; George Davey Smith; Jian Yang; David M Evans
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  A new model for parent-of-origin effect analyses applied to Brown Swiss cattle slaughterhouse data.

Authors:  I Blunk; M Mayer; H Hamann; N Reinsch
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Maternal and paternal genomes differentially affect myofibre characteristics and muscle weights of bovine fetuses at midgestation.

Authors:  Ruidong Xiang; Mani Ghanipoor-Samami; William H Johns; Tanja Eindorf; David L Rutley; Zbigniew A Kruk; Carolyn J Fitzsimmons; Dana A Thomsen; Claire T Roberts; Brian M Burns; Gail I Anderson; Paul L Greenwood; Stefan Hiendleder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic imprinting and genetic effects on muscle traits in mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kärst; Ali R Vahdati; Gudrun A Brockmann; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Consequences of paternally inherited effects on the genetic evaluation of maternal effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Sebastián Munilla; Joaquim Casellas; Carlos Moreno; Juan Altarriba
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  A GWAS assessment of the contribution of genomic imprinting to the variation of body mass index in mice.

Authors:  Yaodong Hu; Guilherme Jm Rosa; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Epigenetics and inheritance of phenotype variation in livestock.

Authors:  Kostas A Triantaphyllopoulos; Ioannis Ikonomopoulos; Andrew J Bannister
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.