OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to examine relationships among several predictors of nutrition comprehension. We were particularly interested in exploring whether nutrition knowledge or motivation moderated the effects of attention on comprehension across a wide age range of adults. METHODS: Ninety-three participants, ages 18-80, completed measures of nutrition knowledge and motivation and then read nutrition information (from which attention allocation was derived) and answered comprehension questions. RESULTS: In general, predictor variables were highly intercorrelated. However, knowledge, but not motivation, had direct effects on comprehension accuracy. In contrast, motivation influenced attention, which in turn influenced accuracy. Results also showed that comprehension accuracy decreased-and knowledge increased-with age. When knowledge was statistically controlled, age declines in comprehension increased. CONCLUSION: Knowledge is an important predictor of nutrition information comprehension and its role increases in later life. Motivation is also important; however, its effects on comprehension differ from knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health educators and clinicians should consider cognitive skills such as knowledge as well as motivation and age of patients when deciding how to best convey health information. The increased role of knowledge among older adults suggests that lifelong educational efforts may have important payoffs in later life. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to examine relationships among several predictors of nutrition comprehension. We were particularly interested in exploring whether nutrition knowledge or motivation moderated the effects of attention on comprehension across a wide age range of adults. METHODS: Ninety-three participants, ages 18-80, completed measures of nutrition knowledge and motivation and then read nutrition information (from which attention allocation was derived) and answered comprehension questions. RESULTS: In general, predictor variables were highly intercorrelated. However, knowledge, but not motivation, had direct effects on comprehension accuracy. In contrast, motivation influenced attention, which in turn influenced accuracy. Results also showed that comprehension accuracy decreased-and knowledge increased-with age. When knowledge was statistically controlled, age declines in comprehension increased. CONCLUSION: Knowledge is an important predictor of nutrition information comprehension and its role increases in later life. Motivation is also important; however, its effects on comprehension differ from knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health educators and clinicians should consider cognitive skills such as knowledge as well as motivation and age of patients when deciding how to best convey health information. The increased role of knowledge among older adults suggests that lifelong educational efforts may have important payoffs in later life. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Deborah M Klohe-Lehman; Jeanne Freeland-Graves; Edward R Anderson; Todd McDowell; Kristine K Clarke; Henry Hanss-Nuss; Guowen Cai; Divya Puri; Tracey J Milani Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-01
Authors: Athena S Hagler; Gregory J Norman; Marion F Zabinski; James F Sallis; Karen J Calfas; Kevin Patrick Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2007 Jan-Feb
Authors: J A Gazmararian; D W Baker; M V Williams; R M Parker; T L Scott; D C Green; S N Fehrenbach; J Ren; J P Koplan Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-02-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Alfred Rademaker; Charles L Bennett; M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Terry C Davis; Franklin Medio; Dachao Liu; June Lee; Marian Fitzgibbon Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jessie Chin; Brennan Payne; Xuefei Gao; Thembi Conner-Garcia; James F Graumlich; Michael D Murray; Daniel G Morrow; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow Journal: Memory Date: 2014-04-30
Authors: Patricia A Cluss; Linda Ewing; Wendy C King; Evelyn Cohen Reis; Judith L Dodd; Barbara Penner Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Diana L Cassady; Elizabeth A Applegate; Laurel A Beckett; Machelle D Wilson; Tanja N Gibson; Kathleen Ellwood Journal: Nutrients Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Laurel A Beckett; Jacqueline J Bergman; Machelle D Wilson; Elizabeth A Applegate; Tanja N Gibson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Carolyn A Sutter; Machelle D Wilson; Jacqueline J Bergman; Laurel A Beckett; Tanja N Gibson Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-01-11