OBJECTIVE: To determine whether trunk muscle attributes are associated with balance and mobility performance among mobility-limited older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation research center. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older adults (N = 70; mean age 75.9 years) with mobility limitations as defined by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). METHODS: Independent variables included physiologic measures of trunk extension strength, trunk flexion strength, trunk extension endurance, trunk extension endurance, and leg press strength. All measures were well tolerated by the study subjects without the occurrence of any associated injuries or adverse events. The association of each physiologic measure with each outcome was examined by the use of separate multivariate models to calculate the partial variance (R(2)) of each trunk and extremity measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Balance measured by the Berg Balance Scale and Unipedal Stance Test and mobility performance as measured by the SPPB. RESULTS:Trunk extension endurance (partial R(2) = .14, P = .02), and leg press strength (partial R(2) = .14, P = .003) accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in SPPB performance. Trunk extension endurance (partial R(2) = .17, P = .007), accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in BBS performance. Trunk extension strength (R(2) = .09, P = .03), accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in UST performance. The variance explained by trunk extension endurance equaled or exceeded the variance explained by limb strength across all three performance outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk endurance and strength can be safely measured in mobility-limited older adults and are associated with both balance and mobility performance. Trunk endurance and trunk strength are physiologic attributes worthy of targeting in the rehabilitative care of mobility-limited older adults.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether trunk muscle attributes are associated with balance and mobility performance among mobility-limited older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Outpatient rehabilitation research center. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older adults (N = 70; mean age 75.9 years) with mobility limitations as defined by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). METHODS: Independent variables included physiologic measures of trunk extension strength, trunk flexion strength, trunk extension endurance, trunk extension endurance, and leg press strength. All measures were well tolerated by the study subjects without the occurrence of any associated injuries or adverse events. The association of each physiologic measure with each outcome was examined by the use of separate multivariate models to calculate the partial variance (R(2)) of each trunk and extremity measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Balance measured by the Berg Balance Scale and Unipedal Stance Test and mobility performance as measured by the SPPB. RESULTS: Trunk extension endurance (partial R(2) = .14, P = .02), and leg press strength (partial R(2) = .14, P = .003) accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in SPPB performance. Trunk extension endurance (partial R(2) = .17, P = .007), accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in BBS performance. Trunk extension strength (R(2) = .09, P = .03), accounted for the greatest amount of the variance in UST performance. The variance explained by trunk extension endurance equaled or exceeded the variance explained by limb strength across all three performance outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk endurance and strength can be safely measured in mobility-limited older adults and are associated with both balance and mobility performance. Trunk endurance and trunk strength are physiologic attributes worthy of targeting in the rehabilitative care of mobility-limited older adults.
Authors: J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Darin T Leetun; Mary Lloyd Ireland; John D Willson; Bryon T Ballantyne; Irene McClay Davis Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Dan K Kiely; Seth Herman; Suzanne G Leveille; Kelly Mizer; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Dan K Kiely; Sharon LaRose; Evelyn O'Neill; Richard Goldstein; Walter R Frontera Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Rachel E Ward; Marla K Beauchamp; Nancy K Latham; Suzanne G Leveille; Sanja Percac-Lima; Laura Kurlinski; Pengsheng Ni; Richard Goldstein; Alan M Jette; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Dennis E Anderson; Jonathan F Bean; Nicole E Holt; John C Keel; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: John Tapper; Grace Huang; Karol M Pencina; Zhuoying Li; Stefan Arver; Anna Martling; Lennart Blomqvist; Christian Buchli; Thomas G Travison; Thomas W Storer; Shalender Bhasin; Shehzad Basaria Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kristine M Erlandson; Suzanne Fiorillo; Fadzai Masawi; Ann Scherzinger; Grace A McComsey; Jordan E Lake; James H Stein; Judith S Currier; Todd T Brown Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Mini E Jacob; Thomas G Travison; Rachel E Ward; Nancy K Latham; Suzanne G Leveille; Alan M Jette; Jonathan F Bean Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053