Literature DB >> 19854056

Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections?

Romain Koszul1, Nancy Kleckner.   

Abstract

Dramatic chromosome motion is a characteristic of mid-prophase of meiosis that is observed across broadly divergent eukaryotic phyla. Although the specific mechanisms underlying chromosome motions vary among organisms studied to date, the outcome is similar in all cases: vigorous back-and-forth movement (as fast as approximately 1mum/sec for budding yeast), led by chromosome ends (or near-end regions), and directed by cytoskeletal components via direct association through the nuclear envelope. The exact role(s) of these movements remains unknown, although an idea gaining currency is that movement serves as a stringency factor, eliminating unwanted inter-chromosomal associations or entanglements that have arisen as part of the homolog pairing process and, potentially, unwanted associations of chromatin with the nuclear envelope. Turbulent chromosome movements observed during bipolar orientation of chromosomes for segregation could also serve similar roles during mitosis. Recent advances shed light on the contribution of protein complexes involved in the meiotic movements in chromosome dynamics during the mitotic program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854056      PMCID: PMC2787882          DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cell Biol        ISSN: 0962-8924            Impact factor:   20.808


  85 in total

Review 1.  Another way to move chromosomes.

Authors:  Yuji Chikashige; Tokuko Haraguchi; Yasushi Hiraoka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Nuclear myosin I acts in concert with polymeric actin to drive RNA polymerase I transcription.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Jian Zhao; Urs Hoffmann-Rohrer; Ingrid Grummt
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Fraying at the edge mouse models of diseases resulting from defects at the nuclear periphery.

Authors:  Tatiana V Cohen; Colin L Stewart
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants.

Authors:  C G Bozza; W P Pawlowski
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  Mitochondria on the move.

Authors:  Istvan R Boldogh; Liza A Pon
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 6.  Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis.

Authors:  Mara N Stewart; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Shigeki Nagai; Karine Dubrana; Monika Tsai-Pflugfelder; Marta B Davidson; Tania M Roberts; Grant W Brown; Elisa Varela; Florence Hediger; Susan M Gasser; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Mechanotransduction gone awry.

Authors:  Diana E Jaalouk; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast Sad1-UNC-84 domain protein Mps3.

Authors:  Jennifer M Bupp; Adriana E Martin; Elizabeth S Stensrud; Sue L Jaspersen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo.

Authors:  Miroslav Dundr; Jason K Ospina; Myong-Hee Sung; Sam John; Madhvi Upender; Thomas Ried; Gordon L Hager; A Gregory Matera
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  82 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome organization and dynamics during interphase, mitosis, and meiosis in plants.

Authors:  Choon-Lin Tiang; Yan He; Wojciech P Pawlowski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges.

Authors:  Daniel A Starr; Heidi N Fridolfsson
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 13.827

3.  Telomeric TERB1-TRF1 interaction is crucial for male meiosis.

Authors:  Juanjuan Long; Chenhui Huang; Yanyan Chen; Ying Zhang; Shaohua Shi; Ligang Wu; Yie Liu; Chengyu Liu; Jian Wu; Ming Lei
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Dynamic properties of meiosis-specific lamin C2 and its impact on nuclear envelope integrity.

Authors:  Daniel Jahn; Sabine Schramm; Ricardo Benavente; Manfred Alsheimer
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 5.  Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.

Authors:  Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Modeling meiotic chromosome pairing: a tug of war between telomere forces and a pairing-based Brownian ratchet leads to increased pairing fidelity.

Authors:  Wallace F Marshall; Jennifer C Fung
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Position matters: multiple functions of LINC-dependent chromosome positioning during meiosis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Katsumata; Eriko Nishi; Sadia Afrin; Kaoru Narusawa; Ayumu Yamamoto
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 8.  Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Doris Y Lui; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Poetry in motion: Increased chromosomal mobility after DNA damage.

Authors:  Michael J Smith; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

10.  Ionizing irradiation-induced radical stress stalls live meiotic chromosome movements by altering the actin cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Doris Illner; Harry Scherthan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.