Literature DB >> 19852872

Comparison of (6 S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid v. folic acid as the reference folate in longer-term human dietary intervention studies assessing the relative bioavailability of natural food folates: comparative changes in folate status following a 16-week placebo-controlled study in healthy adults.

Anthony J A Wright1, Maria J King, Caroline A Wolfe, Hilary J Powers, Paul M Finglas.   

Abstract

Folic acid (pteroylmonoglutamic acid) has historically been used as the reference folate in human intervention studies assessing the relative bioavailability of dietary folate. Recent studies using labelled folates indicated different plasma response kinetics to folic acid than to natural (food) folates, thus obviously precluding its use in single-dose experiments. Since differences in tissue distribution and site of biotransformation were hypothesised, the question is whether folic acid remains suitable as a reference folate for longer-term intervention studies, where the relative bioavailability of natural (food) folate is assessed based on changes in folate status. Healthy adults aged 18-65 years (n 163) completed a 16-week placebo-controlled intervention study in which the relative bioavailability of increased folate intake (453 nmol/d) from folate-rich foods was assessed by comparing changes in plasma and erythrocyte folate concentration with changes induced by an equal reference dose of supplemental (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid or folic acid. The relative increase in plasma folate concentration in the food group was 31 % when compared with that induced by folic acid, but 39 % when compared with (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid. The relative increase in erythrocyte folate concentration in the food group when compared with that induced by folic acid was 43 %, and 40 % when compared with (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid. When recent published observations were additionally taken into account it was concluded that, in principle, folic acid should not be used as the reference folate when attempting to estimate relative natural (food) folate bioavailability in longer-term human intervention studies. Using (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid as the reference folate would avoid future results' validity being questioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852872     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509992339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  6 in total

1.  Perspective: Time to Resolve Confusion on Folate Amounts, Units, and Forms in Prenatal Supplements.

Authors:  Leila G Saldanha; Johanna T Dwyer; Carol J Haggans; James L Mills; Nancy Potischman
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Conversion of calcium-l-methylfolate and (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine salt into dietary folate equivalents.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan De Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexandre Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Marco Vinceti; Francesco Cubadda; José Cortiñas Abrahantes; Céline Dumas; Valeria Ercolano; Ariane Titz; Kristina Pentieva
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 3.  Human folate bioavailability.

Authors:  Veronica E Ohrvik; Cornelia M Witthoft
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Accounting for differences in the bioactivity and bioavailability of vitamers.

Authors:  Jesse F Gregory
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Assessing the association between natural food folate intake and blood folate concentrations: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Claire M Marchetta; Owen J Devine; Krista S Crider; Becky L Tsang; Amy M Cordero; Yan Ping Qi; Jing Guo; Robert J Berry; Jorge Rosenthal; Joseph Mulinare; Patricia Mersereau; Heather C Hamner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Revised D-A-CH intake recommendations for folate: how much is needed?

Authors:  M B Krawinkel; D Strohm; A Weissenborn; B Watzl; M Eichholzer; K Bärlocher; I Elmadfa; E Leschik-Bonnet; H Heseker
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.016

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.