Literature DB >> 19851758

Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches.

Gavin Buckingham1, David P Carey, Francisco L Colino, John deGrosbois, Gordon Binsted.   

Abstract

It is far more difficult to detect a small tactile stimulation on a finger that is moving compared to when it is static. This suppression of tactile information during motion, known as tactile gating, has been examined in some detail during single-joint movements. However, the existence and time course of this gating has yet to be examined during visually guided multi-joint reaches, where sensory feedback may be paramount. The current study demonstrated that neurologically intact humans are unable to detect a small vibratory stimulus on one of their index fingers during a bimanual reach toward visual targets. By parametrically altering the delay between the visual target onset and the vibration, it was demonstrated that this gating was even apparent before participants started moving. A follow up experiment using electromyography indicated that gating was likely to occur even before muscle activity had taken place. This unique demonstration of tactile gating during a task reliant on visual feedback supports the notion this phenomenon is due to a central command, rather than a masking of sensory signals by afferent processing during movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19851758     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2050-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks.

Authors:  Stephan R Williams; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The internal structure of stopping as revealed by a sensory detection task.

Authors:  Eammon Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Rightward biases during bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; David P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  S R Williams; J Shenasa; C E Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Interrelationships between electromyographic, mechanical, muscle structure and reflex time measurements in man.

Authors:  J T Viitasalo; P V Komi
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1981-01

9.  Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model.

Authors:  Y Guiard
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Tactile suppression in goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Gordon Binsted; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  Perceptual and decisional attenuation of tactile perception during the preparation of self- versus externally-generated movements.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile perception during action observation.

Authors:  Roberta Vastano; Alberto Inuggi; Claudia D Vargas; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression.

Authors:  Hanna Gertz; Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Availability of vision and tactile gating: vision enhances tactile sensitivity.

Authors:  Francisco L Colino; Ji-Hang Lee; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Compression and suppression as instances of a similar mechanism affecting tactile perception during movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Tactile gating in a reaching and grasping task.

Authors:  Francisco L Colino; Gavin Buckingham; Darian T Cheng; Paul van Donkelaar; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-03-24

9.  Context-dependent changes in tactile perception during movement execution.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francis McGlone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-06

10.  Tactile Gap Detection Deteriorates during Bimanual Symmetrical Movements under Mirror Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.