Literature DB >> 19851302

Identifying metabolically healthy but obese individuals in sedentary postmenopausal women.

Virginie Messier1, Antony D Karelis, Denis Prud'homme, Vanessa Primeau, Martin Brochu, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare different methods to identify metabolically healthy but obese (MHO) individuals in a cohort of obese postmenopausal women. We examined the anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of 113 obese (age: 57.3 +/- 4.8 years; BMI: 34.2 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2)), sedentary postmenopausal women. The following methods were used to identify MHO subjects: the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (MHO: upper quartile of glucose disposal rates); the Matsuda index (MHO: upper quartile of the Matsuda index); the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (MHO: lower quartile of the HOMA index); having 0-1 cardiometabolic abnormalities (systolic/diastolic blood pressure > or =130/85 mm Hg, triglycerides (TG) > or =1.7 mmol/l, glucose > or =5.6 mmol/l, HOMA >5.13, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) >0.1 mg/l, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) <1.3 mmol/l); and meeting four out of five metabolic factors (HOMA < or =2.7, TG < or =1.7 mmol/l, HDL-C > or =1.3 mmol/l, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol < or =2.6 mmol/l, hsCRP < or =3.0 mg/l). Thereafter, we measured insulin sensitivity, body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), body fat distribution (computed tomography scan), energy expenditure, plasma lipids, inflammation markers, resting blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness. We found significant differences in body composition (i.e., peripheral fat mass, central lean body mass (LBM)) and metabolic risk factors (i.e., HDL-C, hsCRP) between MHO and at risk individuals using the different methods to identify both groups. In addition, significant differences between MHO subjects using the different methods to identify MHO individuals were observed such as age, TG/HDL, hsCRP, and fasting insulin. However, independently of the methods used, we noted some recurrent characteristics that identify MHO subjects such as TG, apolipoprotein B, and ferritin. In conclusion, the present study shows variations in body composition and metabolic profile based on the methods studied to define the MHO phenotype. Therefore, an expert consensus may be needed to standardize the identification of MHO individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19851302     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  42 in total

1.  Nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease and visceral adiposity index among different body size phenotypes.

Authors:  T Du; J Zhang; G Yuan; M Zhang; X Zhou; Z Liu; X Sun; X Yu
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.222

2.  A healthy lifestyle pattern is associated with a metabolically healthy phenotype in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Farah Naja; Leila Itani; Mona P Nasrallah; Hassan Chami; Hani Tamim; Lara Nasreddine
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Performance Evaluation of a Semi-automated Method for [18F]FDG Uptake in Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue.

Authors:  Stefanie A de Boer; Daan S Spoor; Riemer H J A Slart; Douwe J Mulder; Melanie Reijrink; Ronald J H Borra; Gerbrand M Kramer; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Marcel J Greuter
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Relationship between the body adiposity index and cardiometabolic risk factors in obese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Belinda Elisha; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Virginie Messier; Joseph Abdulnour; Antony D Karelis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass decreases pro-inflammatory and thrombotic biomarkers in individuals with extreme obesity.

Authors:  Bárbara Dal Molin Netto; Solange Cravo Bettini; Ana Paula Grotti Clemente; Joana Pereira de Carvalho Ferreira; Katia Boritza; Sandy de Fátima Souza; Maria Emilia Von der Heyde; Carrie P Earthman; Ana R Dâmaso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Evaluation of all Types of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery and its Consequences: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matin Khosravi-Largani; Marzieh Nojomi; Rokhsareh Aghili; Hamidreza Alizadeh Otaghvar; Kiarash Tanha; Seyyed Hashem Sezavar Seyedi; Azadeh Mottaghi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Differences in body composition between metabolically healthy obese and metabolically abnormal obese adults.

Authors:  S M Camhi; P T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Metabolically healthy obesity and its associates in Mongolian Chinese adults.

Authors:  Mingzhi Zhang; Weijun Tong; Jing Chen; Yonghong Zhang; Shengxu Li
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 9.  Metabolically healthy and unhealthy obese--the 2013 Stock Conference report.

Authors:  D Samocha-Bonet; V D Dixit; C R Kahn; R L Leibel; X Lin; M Nieuwdorp; K H Pietiläinen; R Rabasa-Lhoret; M Roden; P E Scherer; S Klein; E Ravussin
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 10.  Obesity, insulin resistance and comorbidities? Mechanisms of association.

Authors:  Ana Valeria B Castro; Cathryn M Kolka; Stella P Kim; Richard N Bergman
Journal:  Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.