Literature DB >> 19851267

Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found?

Alexander W Phillips1, Alun E Jones, Kevin Sargen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains the most common surgical emergency and although diagnosis should be made on clinical grounds, sometimes this can be difficult. Laparoscopy has gained increasing favour as a method of both investigating right iliac fossa pain and treating the finding of appendicitis. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis of appendicitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of all patients who underwent laparoscopy for possible appendicitis at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital over a 1-year period were reviewed. Notes of those patients who underwent an open appendicectomy were also reviewed for comparison. Intraoperative findings were recorded, as were the subsequent pathologic findings.
RESULTS: Over the 1-year period from September 2005 to September 2006, 355 operations for suspected appendicitis were performed. In 277 (78%) cases, these were performed laparoscopically. Seventy-three out of 78 open appendectomies were confirmed as appendicitis. Only 1 of these was not macroscopically evident to the surgeon. The appendix was removed in 259 of the 277 laparoscopic procedures. Correct intraoperative diagnosis was made in 217 (84%) of removed appendices, 12 (29%) of the appendices thought to be macroscopically normal and removed were found to be appendicitis after histologic examination. Eighteen patients undergoing the laparoscopic procedure had their appendix left in situ due to normal appearance; none had represented at 6 months postsurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy may aid in the diagnosis of acute right iliac fossa pain. However, intraoperative diagnosis is not easy with almost one-third of apparently normal appendices being inflamed histologically. We would therefore advocate the removal of a normal looking appendix in the absence of other explanatory pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19851267     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b71957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  23 in total

1.  The impact of regional reconfiguration on the management of appendicitis.

Authors:  D A Healy; D P McCartan; P A Grace; A Aziz; F Dermody; M Clarke Moloney; J C Coffey; S R Walsh; P E Burke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for chronic right lower quadrant abdominal pain.

Authors:  Charles C van Rossem; Kaij Treskes; David L Loeza; Anna A W van Geloven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Axel Sauerwald; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Rolf Lefering; Jörg Ansorg; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Negative Appendectomy: an Audit of Resident-Performed Surgery. How Can Its Incidence Be Minimized?

Authors:  Mohit Kumar Joshi; Richa Joshi; Shaan E Alam; Sarla Agarwal; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Vermiform appendix within incisional hernia.

Authors:  Aaron Kler; Naveed Hossain; Sandeep Singh; Rosaria Scarpinata
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-20

Review 6.  Neurogenic appendicopathy: an underestimated disease-systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Peisl; Oliver Burckhardt; Bernhard Egger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Belinda De Simone; Marco Ceresoli; Goran Augustin; Alice Gori; Marja Boermeester; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Tarasconi; Nicola De' Angelis; Dieter G Weber; Matti Tolonen; Arianna Birindelli; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Michael Kelly; Kjetil Soreide; Jeffry Kashuk; Richard Ten Broek; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Michael Sugrue; Richard Justin Davies; Dimitrios Damaskos; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Raul Coimbra; Massimo Chiarugi; Gabriele Sganga; Adolfo Pisanu; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Edward Tan; Harry Van Goor; Francesco Pata; Isidoro Di Carlo; Osvaldo Chiara; Andrey Litvin; Fabio C Campanile; Boris Sakakushev; Gia Tomadze; Zaza Demetrashvili; Rifat Latifi; Fakri Abu-Zidan; Oreste Romeo; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gianluca Baiocchi; David Costa; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Thomas Scalea; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Amanda K Bond; Nikhil Ladwa; Muhammad S Sajid; Mirza K Baig; Parvinderpal Sains
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Acute Appendicitis: A Weak Concordance Between Perioperative Diagnosis, Pathology and Peritoneal Fluid Cultivation.

Authors:  Sofie Tind; Niels Qvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The morbidity of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  M Lee; T Paavana; F Mazari; T R Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.