Literature DB >> 19851235

Measuring practice capacity for change: a tool for guiding quality improvement in primary care settings.

Sarah N Bobiak1, Stephen J Zyzanski, Mary C Ruhe, Caroline A Carter, Brian Ragan, Susan A Flocke, David Litaker, Kurt C Stange.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Capacity for change, or the ability and willingness to undertake change, is an organizational characteristic with potential to foster quality management in health care. We report on the development and psychometric properties of a quantitative measure of capacity for change for use in primary care settings.
METHODS: Following review of previous conceptual and empirical studies, we generated 117 items that assessed organizational structure, climate, and culture. Using information from direct observation and key informant interviews, a research team member rated these items for 15 primary care practices engaged in a quality improvement intervention. Distributional statistics, pairwise correlation analysis, Rasch modeling, and item content review guided item reduction and instrument finalization. Reliability and convergent validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Ninety-two items were removed because of limited response distributions and redundancy or because of poor Rasch model fit. The final instrument comprising 25 items had excellent reliability (alpha = .94). A Rasch model-derived capacity for change score correlated well with an independently determined, qualitatively derived summary assessment of each practice's capacity for change (rhoS = 0.82), suggesting good convergent validity.
CONCLUSION: We describe a new instrument for quantifying organizational capacity for change in primary care settings. The ability to quantify capacity for change may enable better recognition of practices likely to be successful in their change efforts and those first requiring capacity building prior to change interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19851235     DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181bee2f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  13 in total

1.  The RICH LIFE Project: A cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of health system only vs. health system Plus a collaborative/stepped care intervention to reduce hypertension disparities.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Jill A Marsteller; Kathryn A Carson; Katherine B Dietz; Romsai T Boonyasai; Carmen Alvarez; Chidinma A Ibe; Deidra C Crews; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Edgar R Miller; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Lisa H Lubomski; Tanjala S Purnell; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Measuring the impact of practice-based research networks (PBRNs).

Authors:  James J Werner
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies.

Authors:  Erinn M Hade; David M Murray; Michael L Pennell; Dale Rhoda; Electra D Paskett; Victoria L Champion; Benjamin F Crabtree; Allen Dietrich; Mark B Dignan; Melissa Farmer; Joshua J Fenton; Susan Flocke; Robert A Hiatt; Shawna V Hudson; Michael Mitchell; Patrick Monahan; Salma Shariff-Marco; Stacey L Slone; Kurt Stange; Susan L Stewart; Pamela A Ohman Strickland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Appreciative Inquiry for quality improvement in primary care practices.

Authors:  Mary C Ruhe; Sarah N Bobiak; David Litaker; Caroline A Carter; Laura Wu; Casey Schroeder; Stephen J Zyzanski; Sharon M Weyer; James J Werner; Ronald E Fry; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

5.  Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos R Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Susan A Flocke; James M Gill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Implementing team-based primary care models: a mixed-methods comparative case study in a large, integrated health care system.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Adam Perzynski; Michael B Rothberg; Jaqueline Fox; Mary Beth Mercer; Xiaobo Liu; Bo Hu; David C Aron; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  A systematic review of instruments to assess organizational readiness for knowledge translation in health care.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Randa Attieh; El Kebir Ghandour; France Légaré; Mathieu Ouimet; Carole A Estabrooks; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ready, Set, Change! Development and usability testing of an online readiness for change decision support tool for healthcare organizations.

Authors:  Caitlyn Timmings; Sobia Khan; Julia E Moore; Christine Marquez; Kasha Pyka; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Innovative physical therapy practice: a qualitative verification of factors that support diffusion of innovation in outpatient physical therapy practice.

Authors:  Carla Sabus; Ellen Spake
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 10.  Measuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Marije Bosch; Heather Buchan; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.