Literature DB >> 19848060

Two week rule referral for patients with colorectal cancer below the age of 50; are we being ageist?

J Shabbir1, V Vijayan, M Silavant, A L Fowler, T A Cook, M E Lucarotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The TWR system was introduced in July 2000. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients below the age of 50 years with colorectal cancer (CRC) are experiencing delays in treatment.
METHODS: The CRC database was searched for all newly diagnosed colorectal cancers between January 2001 and December 2005 in patients who were aged less than 50 years.
RESULTS: There were 911 patients with CRC during the study period. Of these, 41 patients (4.5%) were aged under 50. Thirty-eight case notes were retrieved and reviewed; the median age was 47 years. Fourteen (37%) presented as an emergency, 9 (24%) via the TWR, 8 (21%) were non-TWR referrals to outpatients and the remainder were referred via miscellaneous routes. The median time from referral to initial consultation was 11 days (range 8-14 days) in the TWR group, 24 days (range 14-135 days) in the surgical outpatients group and 44 days (range 11-93 days) in the miscellaneous (direct endoscopy, in-hospital physician's referral) group. The median time from referral to initiation of treatment was 51 days (range 15-116 days) in the TWR group, 103 days (range 43-174 days) in the outpatient group and 96 days (range 27-270 days) in the miscellaneous group. Excluding age as a factor, 73% of the non-TWR referrals met the TWR criteria.
CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms of CRC below the age of 50 years may face referral and diagnostic delay if not referred via the TWR system; many of these would be eligible if age was not a deciding factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19848060     DOI: 10.1016/s1479-666x(09)80004-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  5 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunities.

Authors:  Pablo Vega; Fátima Valentín; Joaquín Cubiella
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Primary-to-secondary care referral experience of suspected colorectal malignancy in young adults.

Authors:  K Patel; T Doulias; T Hoad; C Lee; J C Alberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Scoping Review on Ageism against Younger Populations.

Authors:  Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez; Ella Cohn-Schwartz; Senjooti Roy; Liat Ayalon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Time to diagnosis and treatment in younger adults with colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew Castelo; Colin Sue-Chue-Lam; Lawrence Paszat; Teruko Kishibe; Adena S Scheer; Bettina E Hansen; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer in people with symptoms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom G S Williams; Joaquín Cubiella; Simon J Griffin; Fiona M Walter; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.