Literature DB >> 19844243

Relationship of the BOLD signal with VEP for ultrashort duration visual stimuli (0.1 to 5 ms) in humans.

Bariş Yeşilyurt1, Kevin Whittingstall, Kâmil Uğurbil, Nikos K Logothetis, Kâmil Uludağ.   

Abstract

There is currently a great interest to combine electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study brain function. Earlier studies have shown different EEG components to correlate well with the fMRI signal arguing for a complex relationship between both measurements. In this study, using separate EEG and fMRI measurements, we show that (1) 0.1 ms visual stimulation evokes detectable hemodynamic and visual-evoked potential (VEP) responses, (2) the negative VEP deflection at approximately 80 ms (N2) co-varies with stimulus duration/intensity such as with blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response; the positive deflection at approximately 120 ms (P2) does not, and (3) although the N2 VEP-BOLD relationship is approximately linear, deviation is evident at the limit of zero N2 VEP. The latter finding argues that, although EEG and fMRI measurements can co-vary, they reflect partially independent processes in the brain tissue. Finally, it is shown that the stimulus-induced impulse response function (IRF) at 0.1 ms and the intrinsic IRF during rest have different temporal dynamics, possibly due to predominance of neuromodulation during rest as compared with neurotransmission during stimulation. These results extend earlier findings regarding VEP-BOLD coupling and highlight the component- and context-dependency of the relationship between evoked potentials and hemodynamic responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19844243      PMCID: PMC2949125          DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  36 in total

1.  Evidence for a refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli as measured by MRI.

Authors:  S A Huettel; G McCarthy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Temporal characteristics of event-related BOLD response and visual-evoked potentials from checkerboard stimulation of human V1: a comparison between different control features.

Authors:  K Kashikura; J Kershaw; S Yamamoto; X Zhang; T Matsuura; I Kanno
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Spatiotemporal brain imaging of visual-evoked activity using interleaved EEG and fMRI recordings.

Authors:  G Bonmassar; D P Schwartz; A K Liu; K K Kwong; A M Dale; J W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; R Stepnoski; W Chen; X H Zhu; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How not to study spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis; Yusuke Murayama; Mark Augath; Theodor Steffen; Joachim Werner; Axel Oeltermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with FMRI signals in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Whittingstall Kevin; Doug Wilson; Wilson Doug; Matthias Schmidt; Schmidt Matthias; Gerhard Stroink; Stroink Gerhard
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  An fMRI study of neural interaction in large-scale cortico-thalamic visual network.

Authors:  Nanyin Zhang; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Yi Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity.

Authors:  Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Aniruddha Das
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Recent advances in recording electrophysiological data simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Laufs; J Daunizeau; D W Carmichael; A Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Authors:  Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2013-09-04

2.  Submillisecond unmasked subliminal visual stimuli evoke electrical brain responses.

Authors:  Holger F Sperdin; Lucas Spierer; Robert Becker; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hemispheric differences in electrical and hemodynamic responses during hemifield visual stimulation with graded contrasts.

Authors:  Juanning Si; Xin Zhang; Yujin Zhang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Comparison of psychophysical, electrophysiological, and fMRI assessment of visual contrast responses in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Antígona Martinez; Vance Zemon; Matthew J Hoptman; George Hu; Jade E Watkins; Daniel C Javitt; Pamela D Butler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Development of BOLD signal hemodynamic responses in the human brain.

Authors:  Tomoki Arichi; Gianlorenzo Fagiolo; Marta Varela; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Alessandro Allievi; Nazakat Merchant; Nora Tusor; Serena J Counsell; Etienne Burdet; Christian F Beckmann; A David Edwards
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Imaging faster neural dynamics with fast fMRI: A need for updated models of the hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Laura D Lewis
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Resting state in Alzheimer's disease: a concurrent analysis of Flash-Visual Evoked Potentials and quantitative EEG.

Authors:  Antonio Tartaglione; Luciano Spadavecchia; Marco Maculotti; Fabio Bandini
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Cross-Modal Functional Reorganization of Visual and Auditory Cortex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Identified with fNIRS.

Authors:  Ling-Chia Chen; Pascale Sandmann; Jeremy D Thorne; Martin G Bleichner; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.