Literature DB >> 10806040

Evidence for a refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli as measured by MRI.

S A Huettel1, G McCarthy.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of paired presentations of visual stimuli upon the evoked hemodynamic response of visual cortex measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Stimuli were identical 500-ms high-contrast checkerboard patterns, presented singly or with an interpair interval (IPI) of 1, 2, 4, or 6 s (onset-to-onset), followed by an intertrial interval of 16-20 s. Images were acquired at 1.5 Tesla using a gradient-echo echoplanar imaging sequence sensitive to blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) contrast. Single checkerboards evoked a hemodynamic response from visual cortex characterized by a rise at 3 s, peak activation at 5 s, and return to baseline by 10 s. We subtracted subjects' single-stimulus hemodynamic response from their paired-stimulus responses to isolate the contribution of the second stimulus. If the hemodynamic responses were fully additive, the residual should be a time-shifted replica of the single stimulus response. However, the amplitude of the hemodynamic response to the second checkerboard was smaller, and the peak latency was longer, than for the first. Furthermore, the amplitude decrement was dependent upon IPI, such that the response to the second stimulus at 1 s IPI was only 55% of that to a single stimulus, with recovery to 90% at a 6 s IPI. Peak latency was similarly dependent upon IPI with longer latencies observed for shorter IPIs. These results demonstrate an extended refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli consistent with that shown previously for neuronal activity measured electrophysiologically. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10806040     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  46 in total

1.  Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Chun-Siong Soon; Vinod Venkatraman; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Yulin Qin; Myeong-Ho Sohn; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

3.  Correspondence of event-related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing.

Authors:  Deborah Vitacco; Daniel Brandeis; Roberto Pascual-Marqui; Ernst Martin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effects of methylphenidate on cerebral responses to conflict anticipation and unsigned prediction error in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Peter Manza; Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Olivia M Farr; Sheng Zhang; Hoi-Chung Leung; Chiang-shan R Li
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 6.  Ultrafast inverse imaging techniques for fMRI.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kevin W K Tsai; Ying-Hua Chu; Thomas Witzel; Aapo Nummenmaa; Tommi Raij; Jyrki Ahveninen; Wen-Jui Kuo; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Developmental effects of decision-making on sensitivity to reward: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Johanna M Jarcho; Brenda E Benson; Rista C Plate; Amanda E Guyer; Allison M Detloff; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Spatio-temporal information analysis of event-related BOLD responses.

Authors:  Galit Fuhrmann Alpert; Fellice T Sun; Daniel Handwerker; Mark D'Esposito; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling.

Authors:  Genevieve M Heckman; Seth E Bouvier; Valerie A Carr; Erin M Harley; Kristen S Cardinal; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Motor behavior activates Bergmann glial networks.

Authors:  Axel Nimmerjahn; Eran A Mukamel; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.