Literature DB >> 19843469

Quantitative comparison of different fluorescent protein couples for fast FRET-FLIM acquisition.

Sergi Padilla-Parra1, Nicolas Audugé, Hervé Lalucque, Jean-Claude Mevel, Maïté Coppey-Moisan, Marc Tramier.   

Abstract

The fluorescent-protein based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) approach is a powerful method for quantifying protein-protein interactions in living cells, especially when combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). To compare the performance of different FRET couples for FRET-FLIM experiments, we first tested enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) linked to different red acceptors (mRFP1-EGFP, mStrawberry-EGFP, HaloTag (TMR)-EGFP, and mCherry-EGFP). We obtained a fraction of donor engaged in FRET (f(D)) that was far from the ideal case of one, using different mathematical models assuming a double species model (i.e., discrete double exponential fixing the donor lifetime and double exponential stretched for the FRET lifetime). We show that the relatively low f(D) percentages obtained with these models may be due to spectroscopic heterogeneity of the acceptor population, which is partially caused by different maturation rates for the donor and the acceptor. In an attempt to improve the amount of donor protein engaged in FRET, we tested mTFP1 as a donor coupled to mOrange and EYFP, respectively. mTFP1 turned out to be at least as good as EGFP for donor FRET-FLIM experiments because 1), its lifetime remained constant during light-induced fluorescent changes; 2), its fluorescence decay profile was best fitted with a single exponential model; and 3), no photoconversion was detected. The f(D) value when combined with EYFP as an acceptor was the highest of all tandems tested (0.7). Moreover, in the context of fast acquisitions, we obtained a minimal f(D) (mf(D)) for mTFP1-EYFP that was almost two times greater than that for mCherry-EGFP (0.65 vs. 0.35). Finally, we compared EGFP and mTFP1 in a biological situation in which the fusion proteins were highly immobile, and EGFP and mTFP1 were linked to the histone H4 (EGFP-H4 and mTFP1-H4) in fast FLIM acquisitions. In this particular case, the fluorescence intensity was more stable for EGFP-H4 than for mTFP1-H4. Nevertheless, we show that mTFP1/EYFP stands alone as the best FRET-FLIM couple in terms of f(D) analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843469      PMCID: PMC2764072          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

1.  Monitoring protein conformations and interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between mutants of green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  A Miyawaki; R Y Tsien
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Imaging biochemistry inside cells.

Authors:  F S Wouters; P J Verveer; P I Bastiaens
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging by time-correlated single-photon counting.

Authors:  W Becker; A Bergmann; M A Hink; K König; K Benndorf; C Biskup
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Applying spectral fingerprinting to the analysis of FRET images.

Authors:  Richard A Neher; Erwin Neher
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Tracking the interactions of rRNA processing proteins during nucleolar assembly in living cells.

Authors:  Nicole Angelier; Marc Tramier; Emilie Louvet; Maïté Coppey-Moisan; Tula M Savino; Jan R De Mey; Danièle Hernandez-Verdun
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Dual-color photon counting histogram analysis of mRFP1 and EGFP in living cells.

Authors:  Lindsey N Hillesheim; Yan Chen; Joachim D Müller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Analysis of photobleaching in single-molecule multicolor excitation and Förster resonance energy transfer measurements.

Authors:  Christian Eggeling; Jerker Widengren; Leif Brand; Jörg Schaffer; Suren Felekyan; Claus A M Seidel
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Directed evolution of a monomeric, bright and photostable version of Clavularia cyan fluorescent protein: structural characterization and applications in fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Hui-wang Ai; J Nathan Henderson; S James Remington; Robert E Campbell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  The truncated prelamin A in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome alters segregation of A-type and B-type lamin homopolymers.

Authors:  Erwan Delbarre; Marc Tramier; Maïté Coppey-Moisan; Claire Gaillard; Jean-Claude Courvalin; Brigitte Buendia
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Monomeric fluorescent timers that change color from blue to red report on cellular trafficking.

Authors:  Fedor V Subach; Oksana M Subach; Illia S Gundorov; Kateryna S Morozova; Kiryl D Piatkevich; Ana Maria Cuervo; Vladislav V Verkhusha
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 15.040

View more
  39 in total

1.  Golgi sorting regulates organization and activity of GPI proteins at apical membranes.

Authors:  Simona Paladino; Stéphanie Lebreton; Simona Tivodar; Fabio Formiggini; Giulia Ossato; Enrico Gratton; Marc Tramier; Maïté Coppey-Moisan; Chiara Zurzolo
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  Pulsed interleaved excitation fluctuation imaging.

Authors:  Jelle Hendrix; Waldemar Schrimpf; Matthias Höller; Don C Lamb
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Imaging the coordination of multiple signalling activities in living cells.

Authors:  Christopher M Welch; Hunter Elliott; Gaudenz Danuser; Klaus M Hahn
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Non fitting based FRET-FLIM analysis approaches applied to quantify protein-protein interactions in live cells.

Authors:  Sergi Padilla-Parra; Nicolas Auduge; Maite Coppey-Moisan; Marc Tramier
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2011-05-17

Review 5.  Quantitative intensity-based FRET approaches--a comparative snapshot.

Authors:  André Zeug; Andrew Woehler; Erwin Neher; Evgeni G Ponimaskin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Quantitative imaging of endosome acidification and single retrovirus fusion with distinct pools of early endosomes.

Authors:  Sergi Padilla-Parra; Pedro M Matos; Naoyuki Kondo; Mariana Marin; Nuno C Santos; Gregory B Melikyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Single cell optical imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony S Stender; Kyle Marchuk; Chang Liu; Suzanne Sander; Matthew W Meyer; Emily A Smith; Bhanu Neupane; Gufeng Wang; Junjie Li; Ji-Xin Cheng; Bo Huang; Ning Fang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  Fluorescent proteins for FRET microscopy: monitoring protein interactions in living cells.

Authors:  Richard N Day; Michael W Davidson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Single-stranded nucleic acids promote SAMHD1 complex formation.

Authors:  Victoria Tüngler; Wolfgang Staroske; Barbara Kind; Manuela Dobrick; Stefanie Kretschmer; Franziska Schmidt; Claudia Krug; Mike Lorenz; Osvaldo Chara; Petra Schwille; Min Ae Lee-Kirsch
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Förster resonance energy transfer microscopy and spectroscopy for localizing protein-protein interactions in living cells.

Authors:  Yuansheng Sun; Christina Rombola; Vinod Jyothikumar; Ammasi Periasamy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.