OBJECTIVE: To examine how participation is conceptualized by different rehabilitation stakeholder groups. DESIGN: Qualitative case study design. SUBJECTS: A total of 148 participants from different stakeholder groups in 2 US states and the District of Columbia. Stakeholders included people with disabilities (n = 63), caregivers (n = 28), rehabilitation professionals (n = 32), funders (n = 10), and policy makers (n = 15). METHODS: Eighteen focus groups were conducted to examine what participation means, how it is conceptualized, and the barriers to realizing full participation. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim; transcripts were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on 3 primary domains of participation: (i) productivity and economic participation; (ii) social participation and relationships; and (iii) leisure/recreational participation. Participation within each domain was characterized by its diversity, individuality and environmental influences. Differences emerged in the emphasis stakeholders placed on the relevance of the participation domains in the lives of people with disabilities. Stakeholders' emphasis was influenced by their roles within the rehabilitation process and created distinct needs for participation outcome measures. CONCLUSION: While there was agreement about what constitutes participation, stakeholders emphasized different aspects of participation based on their positions in the rehabilitation process. Recommendations are offered for integrating study findings into the development of new participation measures.
OBJECTIVE: To examine how participation is conceptualized by different rehabilitation stakeholder groups. DESIGN: Qualitative case study design. SUBJECTS: A total of 148 participants from different stakeholder groups in 2 US states and the District of Columbia. Stakeholders included people with disabilities (n = 63), caregivers (n = 28), rehabilitation professionals (n = 32), funders (n = 10), and policy makers (n = 15). METHODS: Eighteen focus groups were conducted to examine what participation means, how it is conceptualized, and the barriers to realizing full participation. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim; transcripts were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Stakeholders agreed on 3 primary domains of participation: (i) productivity and economic participation; (ii) social participation and relationships; and (iii) leisure/recreational participation. Participation within each domain was characterized by its diversity, individuality and environmental influences. Differences emerged in the emphasis stakeholders placed on the relevance of the participation domains in the lives of people with disabilities. Stakeholders' emphasis was influenced by their roles within the rehabilitation process and created distinct needs for participation outcome measures. CONCLUSION: While there was agreement about what constitutes participation, stakeholders emphasized different aspects of participation based on their positions in the rehabilitation process. Recommendations are offered for integrating study findings into the development of new participation measures.
Authors: Noelle E Carlozzi; Elizabeth A Hahn; Siera M Goodnight; Anna L Kratz; Jane S Paulsen; Julie C Stout; Samuel Frank; Jennifer A Miner; David Cella; Richard C Gershon; Stephen G Schilling; Rebecca E Ready Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2017-05-29
Authors: Allen W Heinemann; Jin-Shei Lai; Alex Wong; Jessica Dashner; Susan Magasi; Elizabeth A Hahn; Noelle E Carlozzi; David S Tulsky; Sara Jerousek; Patrick Semik; Ana Miskovic; David B Gray Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Elizabeth A Hahn; Jennifer L Beaumont; Paul A Pilkonis; Sofia F Garcia; Susan Magasi; Darren A DeWalt; David Cella Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Allen W Heinemann; Susan Magasi; Joy Hammel; Noelle E Carlozzi; Sofia F Garcia; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; David Tulsky; David B Gray; Holly Hollingsworth; Sara Jerousek Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Isabel Margot-Cattin; Catherine Ludwig; Nicolas Kühne; Gunilla Eriksson; André Berchtold; Louise Nygard; Anders Kottorp Journal: Can J Occup Ther Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 1.614
Authors: David Morley; Sarah Dummett; Laura Kelly; Jill Dawson; Ray Fitzpatrick; Crispin Jenkinson Journal: Patient Relat Outcome Meas Date: 2013-12-11