Literature DB >> 19840700

Sensitivity of self-report mammography use in older women.

Benjamin M Craig1, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Susan T Vadaparampil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent survey evidence indicates a decline in mammography use among older women.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to detect sensitivity of self-reported mammography use and pose evidence-based suggestions to increase survey accuracy.
METHODS: Using the 1991-2006 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 15,357 women, aged > or =65 years, were selected based on use of mammography services. The women were interviewed in the community setting at random periods after screening and asked, Have you had a mammogram or breast X-ray since [today's date or previous supplement round interview date] a year ago? Statistical analyses were conducted between March 11 and April 28 of 2008. This study tested whether sensitivity (i.e., probability of an affirmative response) was dependent on length of the recall period and on respondent demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 90.4% of the older women self-reported use; however, sensitivity decreased as the recall period lengthened (90% at 6 months, 80% at 12 months). This time effect was significantly higher among older, economically disadvantaged women. Sensitivity also decreased an additional 13.8% if the event occurred in the previous calendar year, and 3.5% if conducted in a non-English language or by proxy.
CONCLUSIONS: Greatest sensitivity occurred during the 6-month period after service without straddling calendar years. These findings may aid the tailoring of future surveys for older adults, improving the recall of preventive services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19840700      PMCID: PMC3864094          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  24 in total

1.  Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.

Authors:  Lee S Caplan; David V McQueen; Judith R Qualters; Marilyn Leff; Carol Garrett; Ned Calonge
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Validation of self-reported screening mammography histories among women with and without breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra A Norman; A Russell Localio; Lan Zhou; Leslie Bernstein; Ralph J Coates; Elaine W Flagg; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathleen E Malone; Linda K Weiss; Nancy C Lee; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Estimating racial/ethnic disparity in mammography rates: it all depends on how you ask the question.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Sean Meldrum
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Peter A Briss; Jasmin A Tiro; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white health plan members in northern California.

Authors:  R A Hiatt; E J Pérez-Stable; C Quesenberry; F Sabogal; R Otero-Sabogal; S J McPhee
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.

Authors:  E D Paskett; C M Tatum; D W Mack; H Hoen; L D Case; R Velez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Judith A Long; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Mammography use among older Mexican-American women: correcting for over-reports of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Jonathan D Mahnken; Daniel H Freeman; Anthony R DiNuzzo; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2007

10.  Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population.

Authors:  L Suarez; D A Goldman; N S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mammography use and breast cancer incidence among older U.S. women.

Authors:  Sara D Turbow; Mary C White; Erica S Breslau; Susan A Sabatino
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Mammography use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Lauren D Block; Marian P Jarlenski; Albert W Wu; Wendy L Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Misclassification of survey responses and black-white disparity in mammography use, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995-2006.

Authors:  Rashid Njai; Paul Z Siegel; Jacqueline W Miller; Youlian Liao
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Breast cancer patients' recall of receiving patient assistance services.

Authors:  Jenny J Lin; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2012-10-03

5.  Lack of validity of self-reported mammography data.

Authors:  Robert S Levine; Barbara J Kilbourne; Maureen Sanderson; Mary K Fadden; Maria Pisu; Jason L Salemi; Maria Carmenza Mejia de Grubb; Heather O'Hara; Baqar A Husaini; Roget J Zoorob; Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2019-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.