Literature DB >> 19838912

Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults' ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker.

Ian A Apperly1, Daniel J Carroll, Dana Samson, Glyn W Humphreys, Adam Qureshi, Graham Moffitt.   

Abstract

Keysar et al. (Keysar, Barr, Balin, & Brauner, 2000; Keysar, Lin, & Barr, 2003) report that adults frequently failed to use their conceptual competence for theory of mind (ToM) in an online communication game where they needed to take account of a speaker's perspective. The current research reports 3 experiments investigating the cognitive processes contributing to adults' errors. In Experiments 1 and 2 the frequency of adults' failure to use ToM was unaffected by perspective switching. In Experiment 3 adults made more errors when interpreting instructions according to the speaker's perspective than according to an arbitrary rule. We suggest that adults are efficient at switching perspectives, but that actually using what another person knows to interpret what they say is relatively inefficient, giving rise to egocentric errors during communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19838912     DOI: 10.1080/17470210903281582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  31 in total

1.  Social behaviour and social cognition in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Evelien M Barendse; Marc P H Hendriks; Geert Thoonen; Albert P Aldenkamp; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self-other distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Kristína Czekóová; Michaela Porubanová
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Perspective-taking abilities in the balance between autism tendencies and psychosis proneness.

Authors:  Ahmad M Abu-Akel; Stephen J Wood; Peter C Hansen; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mentalizing or submentalizing in a communication task? Evidence from autism and a camera control.

Authors:  Idalmis Santiesteban; Punit Shah; Sarah White; Geoffrey Bird; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Conceptualizing degrees of theory of mind.

Authors:  Jane Rebecca Conway; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Resting state morphology predicts the effect of theta burst stimulation in false belief reasoning.

Authors:  Charlotte E Hartwright; Robert M Hardwick; Ian A Apperly; Peter C Hansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cortical thickness of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts strategic choices in economic games.

Authors:  Toshio Yamagishi; Haruto Takagishi; Alan de Souza Rodrigues Fermin; Ryota Kanai; Yang Li; Yoshie Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The Exposure Advantage: Early Exposure to a Multilingual Environment Promotes Effective Communication.

Authors:  Samantha P Fan; Zoe Liberman; Boaz Keysar; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05-08

10.  Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking.

Authors:  Debby Damen; Marije van Amelsvoort; Per van der Wijst; Monique Pollmann; Emiel Krahmer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.