Literature DB >> 19838871

Swiss national MD-PhD-program: an outcome analysis.

Katrin Kuehnle1, David T Winkler, Peter J Meier-Abt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims at a first evaluation of the outcome of the Swiss national MD-PhD program during the last 16 years.
METHOD: One hundred and twenty six former and current students in the Swiss national MD-PhD program were surveyed via a Web-based questionnaire in September 2007. Twenty-four questions assessed information regarding participant demographics, information on the PhD thesis and publication activity, current positions and research activity, as well as participant's opinions, attitudes and career goals.
RESULTS: Eighty questionnaires were received from 126 MD-PhD students and graduates (63.5% response rate). The responders consisted of present students (36%), former graduates (56%), and dropouts (8%). The percentage of women in the program was 23%, and the average duration of the program was 4.2 +/- 1.4 years. Research interests were predominantly in the fields of neuroscience, immunology, molecular biology and cancer research. A considerable portion of the MD-PhD graduates had an excellent publication record stemming from their PhD research work, and 89% were planning to continue a research-orientated career. Over 50% of those MD-PhD graduates completing their thesis before 2002 had already reached an assistant or full professor position at the time of the survey. Nearly all participants considered the MD-PhD training helpful to their career and high quality standards were assigned to the acquired practical and intellectual skills. However, criticism was expressed concerning the general mentoring and the career related mentoring. Moreover, general mentoring and career related mentoring were significantly less well perceived in research groups employing more than seven PhD students at the same time.
CONCLUSIONS: The MD-PhD students and graduates surveyed were satisfied with their education and most of them continued a research-orientated career. Regarding the overall positive evaluation, this study supports the view that MD-PhD graduates are well qualified for a successful career in academic medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19838871     DOI: smw-12790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  14 in total

1.  [Impression of the 1975 General Meeting of the Japan Nursing Association. Fulfilment and some disappointment].

Authors:  C Uchibori
Journal:  Hokenfu Zasshi       Date:  1975-06

2.  A randomized double-blind study of timolol in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  J Guevara; M Sukerman; M Velasco
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1975-10

3.  Maintaining a Robust Pipeline of Future Physician-Scientists.

Authors:  Catherine A Blish
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  The combined medical/PhD degree: a global survey of physician-scientist training programmes.

Authors:  Yassar Alamri
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  What happens to clinical training fellows? A retrospective study of the 20 years outcome of a Medical Research Council UK cohort.

Authors:  Paul M Stewart; Simone Bryan; Peter Dukes; Hannah Lesley van Oudheusden; Rhoswyn Walker; Patrick H Maxwell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  MD PhD programmes with relevance to imaging. Results from a European survey.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31

7.  Clinician-scientist MB/PhD training in the UK: a nationwide survey of medical school policy.

Authors:  Ashton Barnett-Vanes; Guiyi Ho; Timothy M Cox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Graduate Training at the Interface of Computational and Experimental Biology: An Outcome Report from a Partnership of Volunteers between a University and a National Laboratory.

Authors:  Albrecht G von Arnim; Anamika Missra
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Publication activities of German junior researchers in academic medicine: which factors impact impact factors?

Authors:  Mona Pfeiffer; Martin R Fischer; Daniel Bauer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Low immediate scientific yield of the PhD among medical doctors.

Authors:  Emil L Fosbøl; Philip L Fosbøl; Sofie Rerup; Lauge Østergaard; Mohammed H Ahmed; Jawad Butt; Julie Davidsen; Nirusiya Shanmuganathan; Simon Juul; Christian Lewinter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.