BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is an important issue that affects many cancer survivors who are increasingly being cared for by internists. OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes and reported practices of internists regarding survivorship care as it pertains to sexual dysfunction. DESIGN: Surveys were sent to 406 physicians affiliated with the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine. Of the 319 eligibles, 227 were returned (71% RR). MAIN RESULTS: Of the 227 responders, 46% were "somewhat/very" likely to initiate a conversation about sexual dysfunction; 62% "never/rarely" addressed sexual dysfunction. Each additional weekly hour spent in patient care was associated with a 2% increase in the likelihood of sexual dysfunction being addressed or discussions about sexual dysfunction being initiated. Reported inadequate preparation/formal training around survivorship issues was associated with sexual dysfunction being addressed less often (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45). Perception of patient anxiety or fears about health was associated with sexual dysfunction being addressed more often (OR = 2.38). Perceived preparedness to evaluate long-term effects was associated with a greater likelihood of physicians initiating discussions about sexual functioning (OR = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors receive their long-term care from internists. Our results suggest that sexual dysfunction is often not addressed during their follow-up care. Additional training is needed to prepare physicians to negotiate this difficult issue.
BACKGROUND:Sexual dysfunction is an important issue that affects many cancer survivors who are increasingly being cared for by internists. OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes and reported practices of internists regarding survivorship care as it pertains to sexual dysfunction. DESIGN: Surveys were sent to 406 physicians affiliated with the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine. Of the 319 eligibles, 227 were returned (71% RR). MAIN RESULTS: Of the 227 responders, 46% were "somewhat/very" likely to initiate a conversation about sexual dysfunction; 62% "never/rarely" addressed sexual dysfunction. Each additional weekly hour spent in patient care was associated with a 2% increase in the likelihood of sexual dysfunction being addressed or discussions about sexual dysfunction being initiated. Reported inadequate preparation/formal training around survivorship issues was associated with sexual dysfunction being addressed less often (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45). Perception of patientanxiety or fears about health was associated with sexual dysfunction being addressed more often (OR = 2.38). Perceived preparedness to evaluate long-term effects was associated with a greater likelihood of physicians initiating discussions about sexual functioning (OR = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS:Cancer survivors receive their long-term care from internists. Our results suggest that sexual dysfunction is often not addressed during their follow-up care. Additional training is needed to prepare physicians to negotiate this difficult issue.
Authors: A B Kornblith; J Anderson; D F Cella; S Tross; E Zuckerman; E Cherin; E Henderson; R B Weiss; M R Cooper; R T Silver Journal: Cancer Date: 1992-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eric S Zhou; Sharon L Bober; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Jim C Hu; Philip W Kantoff; Christopher J Recklitis Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-14
Authors: Cara Stabile; Shari Goldfarb; Raymond E Baser; Deborah J Goldfrank; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Maura N Dickler; Jeanne Carter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Randal S Olshefski; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Vicky Lehmann Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Neeraj K Arora; Roxanne E Jensen; Nadiyah Sulayman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Behringer; H Müller; H Görgen; H-H Flechtner; C Brillant; T V Halbsguth; I Thielen; D A Eichenauer; T Schober; H Nisters-Backes; M Fuchs; A Engert; P Borchmann Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 7.640