S Humphery1, I Nazareth. 1. Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University College London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is an important aspect of sexual heath that is prevalent in the population but frequently goes undetected. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the GP in the management of problems of sexual dysfunction. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to the 218 GPs on the Camden and Islington Health Authority List. The questionnaire collected demographic information on the GPs, their clinical interests, experience, postgraduate qualifications and their view of the clinical importance of sexual dysfunction. Their clinical management of the most recent patient encounter in the previous month was explored using a critical incident technique and they were asked to list their views on barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction and to provide a list of suggestions for tackling these barriers. RESULTS: A total of 133 GPs responded to the questionnaire. Although only eight had a special interest in sexual health, 41 and 50 reported a special interest in mental and women's health, respectively. Forty-six had received postgraduate training in taking a sexual history, 45 in the diagnosis of a sexual problem, 49 in the management of sexual dysfunction, 39 in psychosexual counselling and 24 had training in all four areas. Most GPs (87) categorized sexual dysfunction as medium priority, 25 as high priority and 18 as low priority; three GPs did not respond to this query. Several barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction in general practice were identified. Most doctors identified more than one barrier. CONCLUSIONS: The participating GPs offered specific suggestions that focused on the need for more professional and patient education, consultation time, psychosexual counsellors and relevant secondary care service.
BACKGROUND:Sexual dysfunction is an important aspect of sexual heath that is prevalent in the population but frequently goes undetected. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the GP in the management of problems of sexual dysfunction. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to the 218 GPs on the Camden and Islington Health Authority List. The questionnaire collected demographic information on the GPs, their clinical interests, experience, postgraduate qualifications and their view of the clinical importance of sexual dysfunction. Their clinical management of the most recent patient encounter in the previous month was explored using a critical incident technique and they were asked to list their views on barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction and to provide a list of suggestions for tackling these barriers. RESULTS: A total of 133 GPs responded to the questionnaire. Although only eight had a special interest in sexual health, 41 and 50 reported a special interest in mental and women's health, respectively. Forty-six had received postgraduate training in taking a sexual history, 45 in the diagnosis of a sexual problem, 49 in the management of sexual dysfunction, 39 in psychosexual counselling and 24 had training in all four areas. Most GPs (87) categorized sexual dysfunction as medium priority, 25 as high priority and 18 as low priority; three GPs did not respond to this query. Several barriers to the management of sexual dysfunction in general practice were identified. Most doctors identified more than one barrier. CONCLUSIONS: The participating GPs offered specific suggestions that focused on the need for more professional and patient education, consultation time, psychosexual counsellors and relevant secondary care service.
Authors: Elyse R Park; Sharon L Bober; Eric G Campbell; Christopher J Recklitis; Jean S Kutner; Lisa Diller Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cibele V C Rudge; Iracema M P Calderon; Adriano Dias; Gerson P Lopes; Angélica P Barbosa; Izildinha Maestá; Jon Oyvind Odland; Marilza V C Rudge Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 3.223