| Literature DB >> 19838381 |
Shivam Sinha1, Satish Chandra Goel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amino acids like arginine and lysine have been suggested to hasten the process of fracture healing by improving the local blood supply, supplementing growth factors, and improving collagen synthesis. We studied the role of lysine and arginine in the fracture repair process with regard to the rate of healing, probable mechanisms involved in the process, and mutual synergism between these agents.Entities:
Keywords: Arginine; fracture healing; lysine; nitric oxide
Year: 2009 PMID: 19838381 PMCID: PMC2762560 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.55972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Histopathological grade and criteria for the assessment of histological parameters
| Animal ID | Sacrifice (weeks) | Histological assessment | HPG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callus amount | Cells | Vascular | Cartilage/NBF | Haversian system | Bone matrix | Med. rep. | Cortic rep. | |||
| T39 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| T38 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| T40 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| T41 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| T34 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| T35 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| T31 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| T30 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| T12 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| T13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| T6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| T16 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| T17 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.5 |
| T3 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| T2 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| T18 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| T19 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| T14 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| T15 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| T24 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| T25 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| T8 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| T9 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| T1 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| T10 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| T11 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| C46 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C47 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| C45 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| C44 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| C42 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| C43 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| C33 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| C32 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| C28 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| C29 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| C22 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| C23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| C20 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| C21 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 |
| – | 0.69 | 0.1 | 0.0311 | 0.44 | 0.0250 | 0.0426 | 0.39 | 0.0346 | 0.0371 | |
T = test, C = control, HPG = Histopathological grade
Figure 1Comparison between histology of control and test at 12 weeks, showing partial union in control with an island of cartilage (a) and complete union in the test with marrow formation Haversian system development (b)
Figure 2Sequential X-rays at 0, 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks in control animal shows radiological union at 8 weeks
Figure 3Sequential X-rays at 0, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks in test animal shows radiological union at 6 weeks
X-ray grades of rabbits at different time intervals and their analysis with tests of significance
| Animal ID | Sacrifice (weeks) | X-ray evaluation | XRG | XRG | XRG | XRG | XRG | XRG | XRG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 6 weeks | 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 12 weeks | 20 weeks | ||
| T39 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T38 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T41 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T34 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T35 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T31 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| T30 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| T12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| T13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| T6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| T16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
| T17 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
| T3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | – |
| T2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
| T18 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
| T19 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| T14 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| T15 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| T24 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| T25 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| T8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| T9 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| T1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| T10 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| T11 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| C46 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C47 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C45 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C44 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C42 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C33 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| C32 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| C28 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | – |
| C29 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | – |
| C22 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| C23 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | – |
| C20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| C21 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| – | 0 | 0 | 0.005 | 0.286 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.008 | 0.05 | 1.00 | |
Indicates that data were analyzed also by the chi-square test, XRG = X-ray grade
| X-ray grade, XRG | Score range, XRS | Healing status |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 to +2 | No healing |
| 1 | +3 to +5 | Partial healing |
| 2 | +6 to +8 | Healed |
| Grade 4: | Complete bone union |
| Grade 3: | Less than complete bony union as evidenced by the presence of a small amount of cartilage in fracture callus |
| Grade 2: | Complete cartilage union |
| Grade 1: | Incomplete cartilaginous union (evidenced by the retention of fibrous elements in the plate) |
| Grade 0: | Pseudoarthrosis formation or nonunion seen as an inconvertible cavity within the cartilage plate between fracture fragments containing blood or other fluid. |