PURPOSE: The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite is a validated health related quality of life instrument that is commonly administered after prostate cancer treatment. We classified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores into clinically meaningful groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A development cohort of 561 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy was used to define sexual summary groups by correlation with their responses on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. A separate validation cohort of 430 patients was used to compare Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Long Form sexual bother scores among these sexual summary groups. RESULTS: A sexual summary group score of 0 to 33, 34 to 45, 46 to 60, 61 to 75 and greater than 75 correlated with Sexual Health Inventory for Men groups of severe--1 to 7, moderate--8 to 11, mild/moderate--12 to 16, mild--17 to 21 and no erectile dysfunction--22 to 25, respectively. In the validation group mean sexual bother scores in each of the 5 sexual summary groups were significantly different from each other after controlling for patient age, stage, hormone treatment, marital status and nerve sparing (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores can be categorized into 5 groups for which excellent correlation is found with similar validated groups based on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Also, sexual bother scores are significantly different among the groups, showing that they represent discrete, clinically relevant cutoffs. This will help patients and physicians interpret Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite scores and help define potency for comparison among various prostate cancer treatments.
PURPOSE: The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite is a validated health related quality of life instrument that is commonly administered after prostate cancer treatment. We classified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores into clinically meaningful groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A development cohort of 561 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy was used to define sexual summary groups by correlation with their responses on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. A separate validation cohort of 430 patients was used to compare Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Long Form sexual bother scores among these sexual summary groups. RESULTS: A sexual summary group score of 0 to 33, 34 to 45, 46 to 60, 61 to 75 and greater than 75 correlated with Sexual Health Inventory for Men groups of severe--1 to 7, moderate--8 to 11, mild/moderate--12 to 16, mild--17 to 21 and no erectile dysfunction--22 to 25, respectively. In the validation group mean sexual bother scores in each of the 5 sexual summary groups were significantly different from each other after controlling for patient age, stage, hormone treatment, marital status and nerve sparing (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores can be categorized into 5 groups for which excellent correlation is found with similar validated groups based on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Also, sexual bother scores are significantly different among the groups, showing that they represent discrete, clinically relevant cutoffs. This will help patients and physicians interpret Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite scores and help define potency for comparison among various prostate cancer treatments.
Authors: Daniela Wittmann; Laurel Northouse; Heather Crossley; David Miller; Rodney Dunn; Jennifer Nidetz; Jeanne Montie; Mia Moyad; Katie Lavin; James E Montie Journal: J Sex Marital Ther Date: 2014-01-09
Authors: Sarah L Kerns; Richard Stock; Nelson Stone; Michael Buckstein; Yongzhao Shao; Christopher Campbell; Lynda Rath; Dirk De Ruysscher; Guido Lammering; Rosetta Hixson; Jamie Cesaretti; Mitchell Terk; Harry Ostrer; Barry S Rosenstein Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jonathan J Chipman; Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei; Mark S Litwin; Catrina M Crociani; Meredith M Regan; Peter Chang Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ted A Skolarus; Rodney L Dunn; Martin G Sanda; Peter Chang; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; John T Wei Journal: Urology Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Heather Crossley; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; Patricia Clark; James E Montie Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Julia Murray; Sarah Gulliford; Clare Griffin; Anna Wilkins; Isabel Syndikus; John Staffurth; Miguel Panades; Christopher Scrase; Chris Parker; Vincent Khoo; Jamie Dean; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Simon Thomas; Olivia Naismith; Helen Mossop; Clare Cruickshank; Emma Hall; David Dearnaley Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-12-31
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Michael H Antoni; Patricia I Moreno; Lara Traeger; Dolores Perdomo; Jason Dahn; Gregory E Miller; Steve Cole; Julian Orjuela; Edgar Pizarro; Betina Yanez Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 2.226