Literature DB >> 19837418

Clinical interpretation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary score.

Jeffery C Wheat1, Ryan C Hedgepeth, Chang He, LingLing Zhang, David P Wood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite is a validated health related quality of life instrument that is commonly administered after prostate cancer treatment. We classified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores into clinically meaningful groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A development cohort of 561 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy was used to define sexual summary groups by correlation with their responses on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. A separate validation cohort of 430 patients was used to compare Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Long Form sexual bother scores among these sexual summary groups.
RESULTS: A sexual summary group score of 0 to 33, 34 to 45, 46 to 60, 61 to 75 and greater than 75 correlated with Sexual Health Inventory for Men groups of severe--1 to 7, moderate--8 to 11, mild/moderate--12 to 16, mild--17 to 21 and no erectile dysfunction--22 to 25, respectively. In the validation group mean sexual bother scores in each of the 5 sexual summary groups were significantly different from each other after controlling for patient age, stage, hormone treatment, marital status and nerve sparing (p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form sexual summary scores can be categorized into 5 groups for which excellent correlation is found with similar validated groups based on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Also, sexual bother scores are significantly different among the groups, showing that they represent discrete, clinically relevant cutoffs. This will help patients and physicians interpret Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite scores and help define potency for comparison among various prostate cancer treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19837418     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples' sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Laurel Northouse; Heather Crossley; David Miller; Rodney Dunn; Jennifer Nidetz; Jeanne Montie; Mia Moyad; Katie Lavin; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2014-01-09

2.  A 2-stage genome-wide association study to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with development of erectile dysfunction following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Kerns; Richard Stock; Nelson Stone; Michael Buckstein; Yongzhao Shao; Christopher Campbell; Lynda Rath; Dirk De Ruysscher; Guido Lammering; Rosetta Hixson; Jamie Cesaretti; Mitchell Terk; Harry Ostrer; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Measuring and predicting prostate cancer related quality of life changes using EPIC for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chipman; Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei; Mark S Litwin; Catrina M Crociani; Meredith M Regan; Peter Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Rodney L Dunn; Martin G Sanda; Peter Chang; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Heather Crossley; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; Patricia Clark; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Evaluation of erectile potency and radiation dose to the penile bulb using image guided radiotherapy in the CHHiP trial.

Authors:  Julia Murray; Sarah Gulliford; Clare Griffin; Anna Wilkins; Isabel Syndikus; John Staffurth; Miguel Panades; Christopher Scrase; Chris Parker; Vincent Khoo; Jamie Dean; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Simon Thomas; Olivia Naismith; Helen Mossop; Clare Cruickshank; Emma Hall; David Dearnaley
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-31

7.  Study design and protocol for a culturally adapted cognitive behavioral stress and self-management intervention for localized prostate cancer: The Encuentros de Salud study.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Michael H Antoni; Patricia I Moreno; Lara Traeger; Dolores Perdomo; Jason Dahn; Gregory E Miller; Steve Cole; Julian Orjuela; Edgar Pizarro; Betina Yanez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.