PURPOSE: Respiratory-induced excursions of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma could affect dose delivery. This study quantified tumor motion and evaluated standard treatment margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Respiratory-correlated four-dimensional computed tomography images were obtained on 30 patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; 15 of whom underwent repeat scanning before cone-down treatment. Treatment planning software was used to contour the gross tumor volume (GTV), bilateral kidneys, and biliary stent. Excursions were calculated according to the centroid of the contoured volumes. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation GTV excursion in the superoinferior (SI) direction was 0.55 +/- 0.23 cm; an expansion of 1.0 cm adequately accounted for the GTV motion in 97% of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Motion GTVs were generated and resulted in a 25% average volume increase compared with the static GTV. Of the 30 patients, 17 had biliary stents. The mean SI stent excursion was 0.84 +/- 0.32 cm, significantly greater than the GTV motion. The xiphoid process moved an average of 0.35 +/- 0.12 cm, significantly less than the GTV. The mean SI motion of the left and right kidneys was 0.65 +/- 0.27 cm and 0.77 +/- 0.30 cm, respectively. At repeat scanning, no significant changes were seen in the mean GTV size (p = .8) or excursion (p = .3). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an asymmetric expansion of 1.0, 0.7, and 0.6 cm along the respective SI, anteroposterior, and medial-lateral directions is recommended if a respiratory-correlated four-dimensional computed tomography scan is not available to evaluate the tumor motion during treatment planning. Surrogates of tumor motion, such as biliary stents or external markers, should be used with caution. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: Respiratory-induced excursions of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma could affect dose delivery. This study quantified tumor motion and evaluated standard treatment margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Respiratory-correlated four-dimensional computed tomography images were obtained on 30 patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; 15 of whom underwent repeat scanning before cone-down treatment. Treatment planning software was used to contour the gross tumor volume (GTV), bilateral kidneys, and biliary stent. Excursions were calculated according to the centroid of the contoured volumes. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation GTV excursion in the superoinferior (SI) direction was 0.55 +/- 0.23 cm; an expansion of 1.0 cm adequately accounted for the GTV motion in 97% of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomapatients. Motion GTVs were generated and resulted in a 25% average volume increase compared with the static GTV. Of the 30 patients, 17 had biliary stents. The mean SI stent excursion was 0.84 +/- 0.32 cm, significantly greater than the GTV motion. The xiphoid process moved an average of 0.35 +/- 0.12 cm, significantly less than the GTV. The mean SI motion of the left and right kidneys was 0.65 +/- 0.27 cm and 0.77 +/- 0.30 cm, respectively. At repeat scanning, no significant changes were seen in the mean GTV size (p = .8) or excursion (p = .3). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an asymmetric expansion of 1.0, 0.7, and 0.6 cm along the respective SI, anteroposterior, and medial-lateral directions is recommended if a respiratory-correlated four-dimensional computed tomography scan is not available to evaluate the tumor motion during treatment planning. Surrogates of tumor motion, such as biliary stents or external markers, should be used with caution. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Christopher L Wolfgang; Joseph M Herman; Daniel A Laheru; Alison P Klein; Michael A Erdek; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Wookjin Choi; Ming Xue; Barton F Lane; Min Kyu Kang; Kruti Patel; William F Regine; Paul Klahr; Jiahui Wang; Shifeng Chen; Warren D'Souza; Wei Lu Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Sonali Rudra; Amol K Narang; Timothy M Pawlik; Hao Wang; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Lei Zheng; Dung T Le; David Cosgrove; Ralph H Hruban; Elliot K Fishman; Richard Tuli; Daniel A Laheru; Christopher L Wolfgang; Luis A Diaz; Joseph M Herman Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2012
Authors: Mouen A Khashab; Katherine J Kim; Erik J Tryggestad; Aaron T Wild; Teboh Roland; Vikesh K Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Eun Ji Shin; Mark A Ziegler; Reem Z Sharaiha; Marcia Irene Canto; Joseph M Herman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Lukas Knybel; Jakub Cvek; Bretislav Otahal; Tomas Jonszta; Lukas Molenda; Daniel Czerny; Eva Skacelikova; Marian Rybar; Pavel Dvorak; David Feltl Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 3.481