OBJECTIVES: We investigated ethnic differences in allostatic load in a population-based sample of adults living in Texas City, TX, and assessed the effects of nativity and acculturation status on allostatic load among people of Mexican origin. METHODS: We used logistic regression models to examine ethnic variations in allostatic load scores among non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and people of Mexican origin. We also examined associations between measures of acculturation and allostatic load scores among people of Mexican origin only. RESULTS: Foreign-born Mexicans were the least likely group to score in the higher allostatic load categories. Among individuals of Mexican origin, US-born Mexican Americans had higher allostatic load scores than foreign-born Mexicans, and acculturation measures did not account for the difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings expand on recent research from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with respect to ethnicity and allostatic load. Our results are consistent with the healthy immigrant hypothesis (i.e., newer immigrants are healthier) and the acculturation hypothesis, according to which the longer Mexican immigrants reside in the United States, the greater their likelihood of potentially losing culture-related health-protective effects.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated ethnic differences in allostatic load in a population-based sample of adults living in Texas City, TX, and assessed the effects of nativity and acculturation status on allostatic load among people of Mexican origin. METHODS: We used logistic regression models to examine ethnic variations in allostatic load scores among non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and people of Mexican origin. We also examined associations between measures of acculturation and allostatic load scores among people of Mexican origin only. RESULTS: Foreign-born Mexicans were the least likely group to score in the higher allostatic load categories. Among individuals of Mexican origin, US-born Mexican Americans had higher allostatic load scores than foreign-born Mexicans, and acculturation measures did not account for the difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings expand on recent research from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with respect to ethnicity and allostatic load. Our results are consistent with the healthy immigrant hypothesis (i.e., newer immigrants are healthier) and the acculturation hypothesis, according to which the longer Mexican immigrants reside in the United States, the greater their likelihood of potentially losing culture-related health-protective effects.
Authors: Marielena Lara; Cristina Gamboa; M Iya Kahramanian; Leo S Morales; David E Hayes Bautista Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Jennifer J Salinas; Bassent Abdelbary; Jeffrey Wilson; Monir Hossain; Susan Fisher-Hoch; Joseph McCormick Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2012-05
Authors: Kyle W Murdock; Christopher P Fagundes; M Kristen Peek; Vansh Vohra; Raymond P Stowe Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Heather H McClure; J Josh Snodgrass; Charles R Martinez; Erica C Squires; Roberto A Jiménez; Laura E Isiordia; J Mark Eddy; Thomas W McDade; Jeon Small Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2015-10
Authors: DeMarc A Hickson; Ana V Diez Roux; Samson Y Gebreab; Sharon B Wyatt; Patricia M Dubbert; Daniel F Sarpong; Mario Sims; Herman A Taylor Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jacqueline M Torres; Elissa S Epel; Tu My To; Anne Lee; Allison E Aiello; Mary N Haan Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Felisa A Gonzales; Rena R Jones; Julianna Deardorff; Gayle C Windham; Robert A Hiatt; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Kiarri N Kershaw; Rebeca Espinoza Giacinto; Franklyn Gonzalez; Carmen R Isasi; Hugo Salgado; Jeremiah Stamler; Gregory A Talavera; Wassim Tarraf; Linda Van Horn; Donghong Wu; Martha L Daviglus Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 4.018