Literature DB >> 27439420

Cumulative Physiologic Dysfunction and Pregnancy: Characterization and Association with Birth Outcomes.

Kimberly Schmitt McKee1,2, Christopher Seplaki3, Susan Fisher4,5, Susan W Groth6, I Diana Fernandez3.   

Abstract

Objective To characterize cumulative physiologic dysfunction (CPD) in pregnancy as a measure of the biological effects of chronic stress and to examine its associations with gestational age and birth weight. Methods Women ≤28 weeks gestation were enrolled from obstetric clinics in Rochester, NY and followed through their delivery. CPD parameters included total cholesterol, Interleukin 6 (IL-6), high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index at <14 weeks gestation, glucose tolerance, and urinary albumin collected in the third trimester. Linear regression was used to estimate the association between physiologic dysfunction and birth weight and gestational age, respectively (N = 111). Results CPD scores ranged from 0 to 6, out of a total of 8 parameters (Mean 2.09; SD = 1.42). Three-fourths of the participants had a CPD score of 3.0 or lower. The mean birth weight was 3397 g (SD = 522.89), and the mean gestational age was 39.64 weeks (SD = 1.08). CPD was not significantly associated with either birth weight or gestational age (p = 0.42 and p = 0.44, respectively). Conclusion CPD measured at >28 weeks was not associated with birth weight or gestational age. Refinement of a CPD score for pregnancy is needed, taking into consideration both the component parameters and clinical and pre-clinical cut-points for risk scoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allostatic load; Birth weight; Cumulative physiologic dysfunction; Gestational age; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27439420      PMCID: PMC5389895          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2103-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  35 in total

1.  High-sensitivity enzyme immunoassay for C-reactive protein in dried blood spots.

Authors:  Thomas W McDade; James Burhop; James Dohnal
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Socio-economic status, cortisol and allostatic load: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer B Dowd; Amanda M Simanek; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Louis J Muglia; Michael Katz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  D J Barker; P D Winter; C Osmond; B Margetts; S J Simmonds
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Allostatic load may not be associated with chronic stress in pregnant women, NHANES 1999-2006.

Authors:  Stephanie Morrison; Edmond D Shenassa; Pauline Mendola; Tongtong Wu; Kenneth Schoendorf
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 6.  Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-03

7.  Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging.

Authors:  T E Seeman; B S McEwen; J W Rowe; B H Singer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Measures of obesity and cardiovascular risk among men and women.

Authors:  Rebecca P Gelber; J Michael Gaziano; E John Orav; Joann E Manson; Julie E Buring; Tobias Kurth
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Calvin J Hobel; Amy Goldstein; Emily S Barrett
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.190

10.  Modeling multisystem biological risk in young adults: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Authors:  Teresa Seeman; Tara Gruenewald; Arun Karlamangla; Steve Sidney; Kiang Liu; Bruce McEwen; Joseph Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.937

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care.

Authors:  Kirsten A Riggan; Anna Gilbert; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  Prenatal allostatic load and preterm birth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shahirose Sadrudin Premji; Gianella Santos Pana; Alexander Cuncannon; Paul E Ronksley; Aliyah Dosani; K Alix Hayden; Sharifa Lalani; Joseph Wangira Musana; Kiran Shaikh; Ilona S Yim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-10-04

3.  Allostatic load, a measure of chronic physiological stress, is associated with pregnancy outcomes, but not fertility, among women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Wendy Vitek; Omar Mbowe; Sally W Thurston; Richard S Legro; Ruben Alvero; Valerie Baker; G Wright Bates; Peter Casson; Christos Coutifaris; Esther Eisenberg; Karl Hansen; Stephen Krawetz; Randal Robinson; Mitchell Rosen; Rebecca Usadi; Heping Zhang; Nanette Santoro; Michael Diamond
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.