Literature DB >> 19830974

Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.

Muharrem Comlekoglu1, Mine Dundar, Mutlu Ozcan, Mehmet Gungor, Bulent Gokce, Celal Artunc.   

Abstract

The current study evaluated the effect of different cervical finish line designs on the marginal adaptation of a zirconia ceramic. Four different marginal finish lines (c: chamfer, mc: mini-chamfer, fe: feather-edge and s: rounded shoulder) were prepared on phantom incisors. Die models for each preparation group (N = 28, n = 7 per finish line design group) were made of epoxy resin. Y-TZP (ICE Zirkon) frameworks were manufactured by a copy-milling system (Zirconzahn) using prefabricated blanks and tried on the master models for initial adaptation of the framework; they were then sintered, followed by veneering (Zirconzahn). The finished crowns were cemented with a polycarboxylate cement (Poly F) under 300 g load and ultrasonically cleaned. The specimens were sliced and the marginal gap was measured, considering absolute marginal opening (AMO) and marginal opening (MO) for each coping under a stereomicroscope with image processing software (Lucia). The measurements were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests at a significance level of alpha = 0.01. Means of AMO measurement (microm) for the feather-edge finish line (87 +/- 10) was significantly lower than that of the chamfer (144 +/- 14), shoulder (114 +/- 16) and mini-chamfer finish line types (114 +/- 11) (p < 0.01). Means of MO measurements was the lowest for feather-edge finish line (68 +/- 9) (p < 0.01) and then, in ascending order, shoulder (95 +/- 9), mini-chamfer (97 +/- 12) and chamfer (128 +/- 10). The cervical finish line type had an influence on the marginal adaptation of the tested zirconia ceramic. Although the feather-edge finish line resulted in lower AMO and MO values, with its proven mechanical disadvantage, it cannot be recommended in clinical applications of zirconia crowns. This type of finish line has acted solely as a control group to test the null hypothesis in the current study. For better marginal adaptation, both shoulder and mini-chamfer finish line types could be suggested for zirconia crowns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19830974     DOI: 10.2341/08-076-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  10 in total

1.  Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.

Authors:  Philipp Kohorst; Janet Junghanns; Marc P Dittmer; Lothar Borchers; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations-a literature review.

Authors:  Anke Podhorsky; Peter Rehmann; Bernd Wöstmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Fracture resistance of three-unit zirconia fixed partial denture with modified framework.

Authors:  Arthur Partiyan; Essam Osman; Mohammad M Rayyan; Moustafa Aboushelib; Ahmed Ibrahim; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  The effect of porcelain firing and type of finish line on the marginal fit of zirconia copings.

Authors:  Mahroo Vojdani; Anahita Safari; Mina Mohaghegh; Soheil Pardis; Farideh Mahdavi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-06

5.  Comparison of Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of a CAD/CAM Zirconia Crown with Two Preparation Designs.

Authors:  Hamid Jalali; Leyla Sadighpour; Ali Miri; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-12

6.  Adaptation of zirconia crowns created by conventional versus optical impression: in vitro study.

Authors:  Sibel Cetik; Babak Bahrami; InÈs Fossoyeux; Ramin Atash
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  In vitro Evaluation of the Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns: Micro-CT Comparison Between Different Manufacturing Procedures.

Authors:  Francesco Riccitiello; Massimo Amato; Renato Leone; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Roberto Sorrentino
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-02-22

8.  In vitro comparison of marginal and internal fit between stainless steel crowns and esthetic crowns of primary molars using different luting cements.

Authors:  Sanaa Najeh Al-Haj Ali
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019-11-12

9.  Effect of Finish Line Design on the Fit Accuracy of CAD/CAM Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic-Network Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mirza Rustum Baig; Aqdar A Akbar; Munira Embaireeg
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Effect of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on the Stress Concentration of Endodontically Treated Upper Central Incisor Restored with Zirconia Crown: 3D-FEA.

Authors:  Luigi Giovanni Bernardo Sichi; Fernanda Zapater Pierre; Laura Viviana Calvache Arcila; Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Pietro Ausiello; Alessandro Espedito di Lauro; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.