Literature DB >> 19827470

A comparison of age level on baseball hitting kinematics.

Rafael F Escamilla1, Glenn S Fleisig, Coop DeRenne, Marcus K Taylor, Claude T Moorman, Rodney Imamura, Edward Barakatt, James R Andrews.   

Abstract

We propose that learning proper hitting kinematics should be encouraged at a young age during youth baseball because this may help reinforce proper hitting kinematics as a player progresses to higher levels of baseball in their adult years. To enhance our understanding between youth and adult baseball hitting, kinematic and temporal analyses of baseball hitting were evaluated with a high-speed motion analysis system between 12 skilled youth and 12 skilled adult baseball players. There were only a small number of temporal differences between youth and adult hitters, with adult hitters taking significantly greater time than youth hitters during the stride phase and during the swing. Compared with youth hitters, adult hitters a) had significantly greater (p < .01) lead knee flexion when the hands started to move forward; b) flexed the lead knee over a greater range of motion during the transition phase (31 degrees versus 13 degrees); c) extended the lead knee over a greater range of motion during the bat acceleration phase (59 degrees versus 32 degrees); d) maintained a more open pelvis position at lead foot off ground; and e) maintained a more open upper torso position when the hands started to move forward and a more closed upper torso position at bat-ball contact. Moreover, adult hitters had greater peak upper torso angular velocity (857 degrees/s versus 717 degrees/s), peak left elbow extension angular velocity (752 degrees/s versus 598 degrees/s), peak left knee extension angular velocity (386 degrees/s versus 303 degrees/s), and bat linear velocity at bat-ball contact (30 m/s versus 25 m/s). The numerous differences in kinematic and temporal parameters between youth and adult hitters suggest that hitting mechanics are different between these two groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19827470     DOI: 10.1123/jab.25.3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  6 in total

1.  RETURN TO HITTING: AN INTERVAL HITTING PROGRESSION AND OVERVIEW OF HITTING MECHANICS FOLLOWING INJURY.

Authors:  Ryan Monti
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

2.  Maximum striking velocities in strikes with steel rods-the influence of rod length, rod mass and volunteer parameters.

Authors:  T X Trinh; S Heinke; C Rode; S Schenkl; M Hubig; G Mall; Holger Muggenthaler
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Influence of striking technique on maximum striking velocities-experimental and statistical investigation.

Authors:  Holger Muggenthaler; T X Trinh; S Heinke; C Rode; S Schenkl; M Hubig; G Mall
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Changes in lumbar kinematics and trunk muscle electromyographic activity during baseball batting under psychological pressure.

Authors:  Tomoki Oshikawa; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Gen Adachi; Hiroshi Akuzawa; Koji Kaneoka
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2020-12

5.  Behavioral Measures in a Cognitive-Motor Batting Task Explain Real Game Performance of Top Athletes.

Authors:  Daiki Nasu; Masumi Yamaguchi; Akemi Kobayashi; Naoki Saijo; Makio Kashino; Toshitaka Kimura
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-05-12

6.  Efficacy of Inertial Measurement Units in the Evaluation of Trunk and Hand Kinematics in Baseball Hitting.

Authors:  Niroshan G Punchihewa; Shigeaki Miyazaki; Etsuo Chosa; Go Yamako
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.