Literature DB >> 19826839

The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations.

Nicholas J Gotelli1, Werner Ulrich.   

Abstract

A statistical challenge in community ecology is to identify segregated and aggregated pairs of species from a binary presence-absence matrix, which often contains hundreds or thousands of such potential pairs. A similar challenge is found in genomics and proteomics, where the expression of thousands of genes in microarrays must be statistically analyzed. Here we adapt the empirical Bayes method to identify statistically significant species pairs in a binary presence-absence matrix. We evaluated the performance of a simple confidence interval, a sequential Bonferroni test, and two tests based on the mean and the confidence interval of an empirical Bayes method. Observed patterns were compared to patterns generated from null model randomizations that preserved matrix row and column totals. We evaluated these four methods with random matrices and also with random matrices that had been seeded with an additional segregated or aggregated species pair. The Bayes methods and Bonferroni corrections reduced the frequency of false-positive tests (type I error) in random matrices, but did not always correctly identify the non-random pair in a seeded matrix (type II error). All of the methods were vulnerable to identifying spurious secondary associations in the seeded matrices. When applied to a set of 272 published presence-absence matrices, even the most conservative tests indicated a fourfold increase in the frequency of perfectly segregated "checkerboard" species pairs compared to the null expectation, and a greater predominance of segregated versus aggregated species pairs. The tests did not reveal a large number of significant species pairs in the Vanuatu bird matrix, but in the much smaller Galapagos bird matrix they correctly identified a concentration of segregated species pairs in the genus Geospiza. The Bayesian methods provide for increased selectivity in identifying non-random species pairs, but the analyses will be most powerful if investigators can use a priori biological criteria to identify potential sets of interacting species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826839     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1474-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Microarray challenges in ecology.

Authors:  Jan E Kammenga; Michael A Herman; N Joop Ouborg; Loretta Johnson; Rainer Breitling
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns.

Authors:  Werner Ulrich; Nicholas J Gotelli
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  The checkerboard score and species distributions.

Authors:  Lewi Stone; Alan Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Examination of the "null" model of connor and simberloff for species co-occurrences on Islands.

Authors:  Jared M Diamond; Michael E Gilpin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Swap and fill algorithms in null model analysis: rethinking the knight's tour.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gotelli; Gary L Entsminger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  24 in total

1.  Effects of habitat characteristics and interspecific interactions on co-occurrence patterns of saproxylic beetles breeding in tree boles after forest fire: null model analyses.

Authors:  Ermias T Azeria; Jacques Ibarzabal; Christian Hébert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Complex relationships between species niches and environmental heterogeneity affect species co-occurrence patterns in modelled and real communities.

Authors:  Avi Bar-Massada
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Ecology: Different worlds.

Authors:  Gregory P Dietl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Co-occurrence patterns of Bornean vertebrates suggest competitive exclusion is strongest among distantly related species.

Authors:  Lydia Beaudrot; Matthew J Struebig; Erik Meijaard; S van Balen; Simon Husson; Andrew J Marshall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Male hosts drive infracommunity structure of ectoparasites.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Michal Stanko; Sonja Matthee; Anne Laudisoit; Herwig Leirs; Irina S Khokhlova; Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya; Maxim V Vinarski; Serge Morand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Temporal Overlap and Co-Occurrence in a Guild of Sub-Tropical Tephritid Fruit Flies.

Authors:  Gleidyane N Lopes; Miguel F Souza-Filho; Nicholas J Gotelli; Leandro J U Lemos; Wesley A C Godoy; Roberto A Zucchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biotic interactions as a structuring force in soil communities: evidence from the micro-arthropods of an Antarctic moss model system.

Authors:  Tancredi Caruso; Vladlen Trokhymets; Roberto Bargagli; Peter Convey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Community structure of helminth parasites in two closely related South African rodents differing in sociality and spatial behaviour.

Authors:  Andrea Spickett; Kerstin Junker; Boris R Krasnov; Voitto Haukisalmi; Sonja Matthee
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Environmental proteomics, biodiversity statistics and food-web structure.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gotelli; Aaron M Ellison; Bryan A Ballif
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts.

Authors:  S Kathleen Lyons; Kathryn L Amatangelo; Anna K Behrensmeyer; Antoine Bercovici; Jessica L Blois; Matt Davis; William A DiMichele; Andrew Du; Jussi T Eronen; J Tyler Faith; Gary R Graves; Nathan Jud; Conrad Labandeira; Cindy V Looy; Brian McGill; Joshua H Miller; David Patterson; Silvia Pineda-Munoz; Richard Potts; Brett Riddle; Rebecca Terry; Anikó Tóth; Werner Ulrich; Amelia Villaseñor; Scott Wing; Heidi Anderson; John Anderson; Donald Waller; Nicholas J Gotelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.