Literature DB >> 19826036

Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling.

Chendong Yang1, Jessica Sudderth, Tuyen Dang, Robert M Bachoo, Robert G Bachoo, Jeffrey G McDonald, Ralph J DeBerardinis.   

Abstract

Oncogenes influence nutrient metabolism and nutrient dependence. The oncogene c-Myc stimulates glutamine metabolism and renders cells dependent on glutamine to sustain viability ("glutamine addiction"), suggesting that treatments targeting glutamine metabolism might selectively kill c-Myc-transformed tumor cells. However, many current or proposed cancer therapies interfere with the metabolism of glucose, not glutamine. Here, we studied how c-Myc-transformed cells maintained viability when glucose metabolism was impaired. In SF188 glioblastoma cells, glucose deprivation did not affect net glutamine utilization but elicited a switch in the pathways used to deliver glutamine carbon to the tricarboxylic acid cycle, with a large increase in the activity of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). The effect on GDH resulted from the loss of glycolysis because it could be mimicked with the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose and reversed with a pyruvate analogue. Furthermore, inhibition of Akt signaling, which facilitates glycolysis, increased GDH activity whereas overexpression of Akt suppressed it, suggesting that Akt indirectly regulates GDH through its effects on glucose metabolism. Suppression of GDH activity with RNA interference or an inhibitor showed that the enzyme is dispensable in cells able to metabolize glucose but is required for cells to survive impairments of glycolysis brought about by glucose deprivation, 2-deoxyglucose, or Akt inhibition. Thus, inhibition of GDH converted these glutamine-addicted cells to glucose-addicted cells. The findings emphasize the integration of glucose metabolism, glutamine metabolism, and oncogenic signaling in glioblastoma cells and suggest that exploiting compensatory pathways of glutamine metabolism can improve the efficacy of cancer treatments that impair glucose utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826036      PMCID: PMC2764330          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  45 in total

1.  Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Rebecca L Elstrom; Daniel E Bauer; Monica Buzzai; Robyn Karnauskas; Marian H Harris; David R Plas; Hongming Zhuang; Ryan M Cinalli; Abass Alavi; Charles M Rudin; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Alanine metabolism in the perfused rat liver. Studies with (15)N.

Authors:  J T Brosnan; M E Brosnan; M Yudkoff; I Nissim; Y Daikhin; A Lazarow; O Horyn; I Nissim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Inhibition of glutaminase expression by antisense mRNA decreases growth and tumourigenicity of tumour cells.

Authors:  C Lobo; M A Ruiz-Bellido; J C Aledo; J Márquez; I Núñez De Castro; F J Alonso
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Glutamine and cancer.

Authors:  M A Medina
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Alkylating DNA damage stimulates a regulated form of necrotic cell death.

Authors:  Wei-Xing Zong; Dara Ditsworth; Daniel E Bauer; Zhao-Qi Wang; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography correlates with Akt pathway activity but is not predictive of clinical outcome during mTOR inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Wen Wee Ma; Heather Jacene; Dongweon Song; Felip Vilardell; Wells A Messersmith; Dan Laheru; Richard Wahl; Chris Endres; Antonio Jimeno; Martin G Pomper; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Imatinib (STI571)-mediated changes in glucose metabolism in human leukemia BCR-ABL-positive cells.

Authors:  Sven Gottschalk; Nora Anderson; Carsten Hainz; S Gail Eckhardt; Natalie J Serkova
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Glutamine and cancer.

Authors:  W W Souba
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A relation between (NAD+)/(NADH) potentials and glucose utilization in rat brain slices.

Authors:  G Gibson; J P Blass
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1976-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Proteomic changes in renal cancer and co-ordinate demonstration of both the glycolytic and mitochondrial aspects of the Warburg effect.

Authors:  Richard D Unwin; Rachel A Craven; Patricia Harnden; Sarah Hanrahan; Nick Totty; Margaret Knowles; Ian Eardley; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  202 in total

1.  Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-Cdh1 coordinates glycolysis and glutaminolysis with transition to S phase in human T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Sergio L Colombo; Miriam Palacios-Callender; Nanci Frakich; Joel De Leon; Christoph A Schmitt; Leanne Boorn; Nicola Davis; Salvador Moncada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The structure and allosteric regulation of mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Ming Li; Changhong Li; Aron Allen; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 3.  Glutamate and the biology of gliomas.

Authors:  John de Groot; Harald Sontheimer
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 4.  The structure and allosteric regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Ming Li; Changhong Li; Aron Allen; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 5.  Glutamine and cancer: cell biology, physiology, and clinical opportunities.

Authors:  Christopher T Hensley; Ajla T Wasti; Ralph J DeBerardinis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Amino acid management in cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Yang Tsun; Richard Possemato
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  The glutamate/cystine antiporter SLC7A11/xCT enhances cancer cell dependency on glucose by exporting glutamate.

Authors:  Pranavi Koppula; Yilei Zhang; Jiejun Shi; Wei Li; Boyi Gan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Glutaminolysis and carcinogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Marcel Cetindis; Thorsten Biegner; Adelheid Munz; Peter Teriete; Siegmar Reinert; Martin Grimm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Therapeutic strategies impacting cancer cell glutamine metabolism.

Authors:  Michael J Lukey; Kristin F Wilson; Richard A Cerione
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.808

10.  Energy metabolism of cancer: Glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation (Review).

Authors:  Jie Zheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.