Literature DB >> 19825059

Assessing the clinical or pharmaco-economical benefit of target controlled desflurane delivery in surgical patients using the Zeus anaesthesia machine.

B Lortat-Jacob1, V Billard, W Buschke, F Servin.   

Abstract

The Zeus anaesthesia machine includes an auto-control mode which allows targeting of end-tidal volatile and inspired oxygen concentrations. We assessed the clinical benefits and economic impact of this target-controlled anaesthesia compared with conventional manually controlled anaesthesia. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive desflurane either with a fresh gas flow set by the anaesthetist or in auto-control mode. Drug delivery was adjusted to maintain bispectral index between 40-60 units and systolic arterial pressure under 15 mmHg above its pre-induction value (upper limit) and over 90 mmHg (lower limit). Blood pressure was maintained in the desired range for 89% and 91% of the maintenance period for auto-control and manual control respectively (p = 0.49). Bispectral index was in the desired range for 82% and 79% of the maintenance period, for auto-control and manual control respectively (p = 0.46). Oxygen consumption was more than halved by the use of auto-control mode, and mean (SD) desflurane consumption during surgery was 0.07 (0.04) vs 0.2 (0.07) ml.min(-1) in auto-control and manual control respectively (p < 0.0001). The number of drug delivery adjustments per hour was significantly lower in auto-control mode (mean (SD) 7 (2) vs 15 (12); p < 0.0001). Thus, the auto-control mode provided similar haemodynamic stability and bispectral control as did conventional manually controlled anaesthesia, but led to a reduction in gas and vapour consumption with a more clinically acceptable workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19825059     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06081.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

1.  End-tidal versus manually-controlled low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  Umberto Lucangelo; Giuliana Garufi; Emanuele Marras; Massimo Ferluga; Federica Turchet; Francesca Bernabè; Lucia Comuzzi; Giorgio Berlot; Walter A Zin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  New technology in anaesthesia: friend or foe?

Authors:  R Ross Kennedy
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Context-sensitive decrement times for inhaled anesthetics in obese patients explored with Gas Man®.

Authors:  Jonas Weber; Johannes Schmidt; Steffen Wirth; Stefan Schumann; James H Philip; Leopold H J Eberhart
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Optimizing target control of the vessel rich group with volatile anesthetics.

Authors:  Christopher W Connor
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Robotic Anesthesia: How is it Going to Change Our Practice?

Authors:  Arthur Atchabahian; Thomas M Hemmerling
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-01-23

6.  Cost efficiency of target-controlled inhalational anesthesia.

Authors:  Meenoti Pramod Potdar; Laxmi L Kamat; Manjeet P Save
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.